Case report of a conservative management of cervical esophageal perforation with acrylic glue injection.

P Anoldo, M Manigrasso, F Milone, G D De Palma, M Milone

Open access · diamondAbstract readCase Reports

In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

1citing papers in PubMed

0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

Cyanoacrylate in Colorectal Surgery: Is It Safe?Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

P AnoldoDepartment of Surgical Specialties and Nephrology, "Federico II" University, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.

M ManigrassoDepartment of Surgical Specialties and Nephrology, "Federico II" University, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.

F MiloneDepartment of Surgical Specialties and Nephrology, "Federico II" University, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.

G D De PalmaDepartment of Surgery and Advanced Technologies, "Federico II" University, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.

M MiloneDepartment of Surgical Specialties and Nephrology, "Federico II" University, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.

Federico II University Hospital · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundperforation of the upper aerodigestive tract is a potentially life-threatening condition. The appropriate treatment of cervical esophageal perforation is still controversial. CASE PRESENTATION: we report a case of cervical esophageal perforation that was effectively treated by a conservative management with acrylic glue injection. DISCUSSION: the management of cervical esophageal perforations has been controversial and little studied. Various treatment options, including surgical and nonsurgical management have been advocated, and no gold standard surgical treatment has yet been established. Some authors have recommended immediate surgical intervention, especially in penetrating trauma, conversely, several studies support conservative management.

conclusionswe consider that the application of acrylic glue can be considered a promising, minimally invasive therapeutic option in the management of cervical esophageal perforation. However, the sufficient accumulation of similarly treated cases is necessary in order to confirm the efficacy and safety of this treatment modality.

Indexed as

CervicalConservativeEsophageal perforationGlueIatrogenic

Identifiers

PMID29922461

DOI10.1016/j.amsu.2018.05.009

PMCPMC6004773

OpenAlexW2805965727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY-NC-ND

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.