Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29922460›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2018

Optimizing engagement of undergraduate students in medical education research: The eMERG training network.

Michail Sideris, John Hanrahan, Nikolaos Staikoglou, Panteleimon Pantelidis, Connie Pidgeon, Nikolaos Psychalakis, Nikolai Andersen, Theodore Pittaras, Thanos Athanasiou, Georgios Tsoulfas and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Michail Siderisesmsc Medical Education Research Group (eMERG Collaboration), Experimental Research Center ELPEN, Greece.
John Hanrahanesmsc Medical Education Research Group (eMERG Collaboration), Experimental Research Center ELPEN, Greece.
Nikolaos Staikoglouesmsc Medical Education Research Group (eMERG Collaboration), Experimental Research Center ELPEN, Greece.
Panteleimon Pantelidisesmsc Medical Education Research Group (eMERG Collaboration), Experimental Research Center ELPEN, Greece.
Connie Pidgeonesmsc Medical Education Research Group (eMERG Collaboration), Experimental Research Center ELPEN, Greece.
Nikolaos Psychalakisesmsc Medical Education Research Group (eMERG Collaboration), Experimental Research Center ELPEN, Greece.
Nikolai Andersenesmsc Medical Education Research Group (eMERG Collaboration), Experimental Research Center ELPEN, Greece.
Theodore Pittarasesmsc Medical Education Research Group (eMERG Collaboration), Experimental Research Center ELPEN, Greece.
Thanos Athanasiouesmsc Medical Education Research Group (eMERG Collaboration), Experimental Research Center ELPEN, Greece.
Georgios Tsoulfasesmsc Medical Education Research Group (eMERG Collaboration), Experimental Research Center ELPEN, Greece.
Apostolos Papaloisesmsc Medical Education Research Group (eMERG Collaboration), Experimental Research Center ELPEN, Greece.
Elpen Pharmaceutical (Greece) · GRAristotle University of Thessaloniki · GRBarts Health NHS Trust · GBKing's College London · GBNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRQueen Mary University of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe practice of evidence-based medicine and critical appraisal are essential for the modern doctor. Early engagement of medical students in research methodology is considered as a rising need for most medical school curricula; however, few peer-reviewed initiatives have been reported so far. We developed a Medical Education Research Group (eMERG) as part of a novel undergraduate surgical masterclass, which aimed to train undergraduate students on basic research methodology, as well as to motivate them to pursue a clinical and academic career in surgical specialties.Methods: eMERG consists of an international structured network of senior academics, consultant-level clinicians, senior and junior trainees who support undergraduate trainees. Students are selected from a competitive pool of applicants. Several small prospective studies in skills-based education, as well as systematic reviews on similar topics, have run under the umbrella of this framework, in the form of scholarship awards. Structured feedback questionnaires were distributed to evaluate the experience of the first three years.

results12 students have participated in this pilot initiative. 11 manuscripts have been submitted for publication and 8 were accepted following peer-review in MEDLINE-indexed journals. Delegates perceived this experience as an excellent training opportunity which improved their research productivity. Delegates also stated engagement in research developed interest in the relevant surgical speciality, impacting their career aspirations.

conclusionseMERG is one of the first reported European educational research networks for undergraduates. Research outcomes and students' perceptions conclude that eMERG enhances engagement with research methodology and motivation towards a career in surgery.

Indexed as

eMERGESMSCMedical educationResearch networkUndergraduate surgical education

Identifiers

PMID29922460
PMCPMC6004769
OpenAlexW2804024079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.