ArticleJournal of human kinetics2018
Balance and Lower Limb Muscle Activation between In-Line and Traditional Lunge Exercises.
Article in Journal of human kinetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Systematic Review of the Importance of Hip Muscle Strength, Activation, and Structure in Balance and Mobility Tasks.Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2022Pooled it
- Gluteus Maximus Activation during Common Strength and Hypertrophy Exercises: A Systematic Review.Journal of sports science & medicine · 2020Pooled it
- Barbell Hip Thrust, Muscular Activation and Performance: A Systematic Review.Journal of sports science & medicine · 2019Pooled it
- Effects of Foot Progression Angle and Stance Width on Lower-Limb Muscle Activation During the Holding Phase of Forward Lunge Exercises in Healthy Adults: A Randomized Within-Participant Crossover Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Effects of Step Length and Stride Variation During Forward Lunges on Lower-Extremity Muscle Activity.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2025Article
- Riding a Mechanical Scooter from the Inconvenient Side Promotes Muscular Balance Development in Children.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Effect of Load Distribution on Trunk Muscle Activity with Lunge Exercises in Amateur Athletes: Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Effects of loading positions on the activation of trunk and hip muscles during flywheel and dumbbell single-leg Romanian deadlift exercises.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Article
- Influence of Different Load Conditions on Lower Extremity Biomechanics during the Lunge Squat in Novice Men.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- The effect of breathing technique on sticking region during maximal bench press.Biology of sport · 2021Article
- Changes in Muscle Pattern Activity during the Asymmetric Flat Bench Press (Offset Training).International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In-line and traditional lunge exercises present differences in technique as lower limb positioning (anterioposterior), and medio-lateral (ML) balance may differentially affect primary and stabilizer muscles. The purposes of this study were to examine ML balance and muscle activation in anterior and posterior leg positions between in-line and traditional lunge exercises. Fifteen young, healthy, resistance-trained men (25 ± 5 years) performed 2 different lunge exercises (in-line and traditional) at their 10 repetition maximum in a randomized, counterbalanced fashion. Surface electromyography measured muscle activation of the vastus lateralis, biceps femoris, gluteus maximus, and gluteus medius. ML balance was measured with a Wii Fit Balance Board. The vastus lateralis activity was not significantly different between exercises or leg positions. The biceps femoris activity was not significantly different between exercises, however, it was significantly greater in the anterior compared to the posterior position for the in-line (p = 0.003), and traditional lunge (p < 0.001). The gluteus maximus activity was not significantly different between exercises, however, it was significantly greater in the anterior compared to posterior position for the in-line (p < 0.001) and traditional lunge (p < 0.001). ML balance was significantly greater in the in-line exercise in the anterior limb (p = 0.001). Thus, both in-line and traditional lunge exercises presented similar overall levels of muscle activation, yet the anterior limb generated the highest biceps femoral and gluteus maximus muscle activation when compared to the posterior limb. The in-line lunge presents greater ML balance when compared to the traditional lunge exercise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.