ArticleFrontiers in immunology2018
Fake News or Weak Science? Visibility and Characterization of Antivaccine Webpages Returned by Google in Different Languages and Countries.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 133 citations in OpenAlex.
- Communication strategies in childhood vaccine hesitancy: a scoping review.Revista de saude publica · 2026Article
- The use of social media as an influence on vaccination rates: A systematic review protocol.PloS one · 2025Article
- COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy and Misinformation Endorsement among a Sample of Native Spanish-Speakers in the US: A Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Suppressing Scientific Discourse on Vaccines? Self-perceptions of researchers and practitioners.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2024Article
- Spreading of misinformation on mass media and digital platforms regarding vaccines. A systematic scoping review on stakeholders, policymakers, and sentiments/behavior of Italian consumers.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2023Article
- Anti-Vaccine Discourse on Social Media: An Exploratory Audit of Negative Tweets about Vaccines and Their Posters.Vaccines · 2022Article
- Article
- Overview of Tools and Measures Investigating Vaccine Hesitancy in a Ten Year Period: A Scoping Review.Vaccines · 2022Article
- Consumption of Herbal Supplements or Homeopathic Remedies to Prevent COVID-19 and Intention of Vaccination for COVID-19 in Latin America and the Caribbean.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2022Article
- Online Information of COVID-19: Visibility and Characterization of Highest Positioned Websites by Google between March and April 2020-A Cross-Country Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Debunking health myths on the internet: the persuasive effect of (visual) online communication.Zeitschrift fur Gesundheitswissenschaften = Journal of public health · 2022Article
- Anti-vaccination movements in the world and in Brazil.Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical · 2022Article
- Cultural Variance in Reception and Interpretation of Social Media COVID-19 Disinformation in French-Speaking Regions.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Development of a Codebook of Online Anti-Vaccination Rhetoric to Manage COVID-19 Vaccine Misinformation.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Online information on face masks: analysis of websites in Italian and English returned by different search engines.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Do we need the criminalization of medical fake news?Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2021Article
- Article
- Does Seeing What Others Do Through Social Media Influence Vaccine Uptake and Help in the Herd Immunity Through Vaccination? A Cross-Sectional Analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2021Article
- Social media and vaccine hesitancy: new updates for the era of COVID-19 and globalized infectious diseases.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2020Review
- Online Information on Probiotics: Does It Match Scientific Evidence?Frontiers in medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
11 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The 1998
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.