Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29922147›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in aging neuroscience2018

Deciphering the Astrocyte Reaction in Alzheimer's Disease.

Beatriz G Perez-Nievas, Alberto Serrano-Pozo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 189 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
189citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

189 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Complex interplay of astrogliosis and pathology in preclinical Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Ultrastructural Characteristics of the Juvenile Chum Salmon (International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  20. Review

129 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Beatriz G Perez-NievasInstitute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Alberto Serrano-PozoAlzheimer's Research Unit, MassGeneral Institute for Neurodegenerative Diseases (MIND), Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.

Funding

Neuroscience Resident Research ProgramR25NS065743 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI CASH, SYDNEY S, WILLIAMS, ZIV · 2009 to 2023
$11.8M
Carver College of Medicine Clinical Neuroscientist Training Program (CNS-TP)R25NS079173 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI RICHERSON, GEORGE B · 2012 to 2023
$805k
NINDS NIH HHS R25 NS065743NINDS NIH HHS R25 NS079173
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reactive astrocytes were identified as a component of

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseaseamyloid plaquesastrocytesgliamicroglianeurofibrillary tangles

Identifiers

PMID29922147
PMCPMC5996928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.