Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29922078›Full record

ReviewClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR2018

A systematic literature review of the clinical and health economic burden of schizophrenia in privately insured patients in the United States.

Wenjie Zhang, Tony B Amos, Stephen W Gutkin, Nicole Lodowski, Emma Giegerich, Kruti Joshi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Transitional discharge interventions for people with schizophrenia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Opioid antagonists are associated with a reduction in the symptoms of schizophrenia: a meta-analysis of controlled trials.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wenjie ZhangWG US Advanced Health Analytics (WG AHA), Stamford, CT, USA.
Tony B AmosJanssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Titusville, NJ, USA.
Stephen W GutkinWG US Advanced Health Analytics (WG AHA), Stamford, CT, USA.
Nicole LodowskiWG US Advanced Health Analytics (WG AHA), Stamford, CT, USA.
Emma GiegerichWG US Advanced Health Analytics (WG AHA), Stamford, CT, USA.
Kruti JoshiJanssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Titusville, NJ, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to conduct a systematic literature review on the burden of schizophrenia in privately insured US patients. MATERIALS AND

methodsA systematic literature review of English language peer-reviewed journal articles of observational studies published from 2006 to 2016 was conducted using EMBASE/MEDLINE databases. Abstracts covering substantial numbers of patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (i.e., N ≥ 100) were included for full-text review. Articles that did not clearly specify private insurance types were excluded.

resultsA total of 25 studies were reviewed; 10 included only privately insured patients; and 15 included a mix of different types of insurance. The review of the clinical burden of schizophrenia revealed the following: compared to patients with no mental disorders, those with schizophrenia had significantly increased odds of systemic disorders and both alcohol and substance abuse. Antipsychotic (AP) adherence was low, ranging from 31.5% to 68.7%. The medication possession ratio for AP adherence ranged from 0.22 to 0.73. The review of the health economic burden of schizophrenia revealed the following: patients with a recent (vs. chronic) diagnosis of schizophrenia had significantly higher frequencies of emergency department visits and hospitalizations and greater length of stay (LOS) and total annual per-capita costs. Mean all-cause hospitalizations and LOS decreased significantly after (vs. before) initiating long-acting injectable APs (LAIs). Patients also had significantly decreased mean all-cause, and schizophrenia-related, hospitalization costs after initiating LAIs. Total direct per-capita costs of care (but not pharmacy costs) for patients who were nonadherent to their oral APs within the first 90 days of their index event were significantly higher (vs. early adherent patients). Despite these potential benefits, only 0.25%-13.1% of patients were treated with LAIs across all studies.

conclusionPrivately insured US patients with schizophrenia experience a substantial clinical and health economic burden related to comorbidities, acute care needs, nonadherence, and polypharmacy and have relatively low use of LAIs. Further study is warranted to understand prescribing patterns and clinical policies related to this patient population.

Indexed as

adherenceburden of illnesscomorbiditycosthealth resource utilizationschizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID29922078
PMCPMC5997131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.