Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29922043›Full record

ArticlePatient preference and adherence2018

Patient preferences in Italy: health state utilities associated with attributes of weekly injection devices for treatment of type 2 diabetes.

Louis S Matza, Kristina S Boye, Jessica B Jordan, Kirsi Norrbacka, Raffaella Gentilella, Amara R Tiebout, Chantelle Browne, Marco Orsini Federici, Giovanni Biricolti, Katie D Stewart

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Disutilities of treatment-related attributes for type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Physician Perceptions of Dose Escalation for Type 2 Diabetes Medications in the United States.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Patient Perceptions of and Preferences Between Characteristics of Injectable Diabetes Treatments.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2021
    Article
  13. Health state utilities associated with treatment process for oral and injectable GLP-1 receptor agonists for type 2 diabetes.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2021
    Article
  14. Patient Preferences and Health State Utilities Associated with Mealtime Insulin Concentrations Among Patients with Diabetes in Italy.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2020
    Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Louis S MatzaPatient-Centered Research, Evidera, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Kristina S BoyeEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Jessica B JordanPatient-Centered Research, Evidera, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Kirsi NorrbackaEli Lilly and Company, Helsinki, Finland.
Raffaella GentilellaEli Lilly and Company, Florence, Italy.
Amara R TieboutPatient-Centered Research, Evidera, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Chantelle BrowneModeling and Simulation, Evidera, London, UK.
Marco Orsini FedericiEli Lilly and Company, Florence, Italy.
Giovanni BiricoltiEli Lilly and Company, Florence, Italy.
Katie D StewartPatient-Centered Research, Evidera, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Eli Lilly (Italy) · ITGramercy Research Group (United States) · USEli Lilly (United States) · USSystem Simulation (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSeveral glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists are administered as weekly injections for treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D). These medications vary in their injection processes, and a recent study in the UK found that these differences had an impact on patient preference and health state utilities. The purpose of this study was to replicate the UK study in Italy to examine preferences of an Italian patient sample, while allowing for comparison between utilities in the UK and Italy. MATERIALS AND

methodsParticipants with T2D in Italy valued health states in time trade-off interviews. All health states had the same description of T2D, but differed in description of the treatment process. As in the original UK study, the first health state described an oral treatment regimen, while additional health states added a weekly injection. The injection health states differed in three injection-related attributes: requirements for reconstituting the medication, waiting during medication preparation, and needle handling.

resultsInterviews were completed by 238 patients (58.8% male; mean age = 60.2 years; 118 from Milan, 120 from Rome). The oral treatment health state had a mean (SD) utility of 0.90 (0.10). The injection health states had significantly (

conclusionDisutilities associated with the injection device characteristics were similar to those reported with the UK sample. Results suggest that injection device attributes may be important to some patients with T2D, and it may be useful for clinicians to consider these attributes when choosing medication for patients initiating these weekly treatments.

Indexed as

GLP-1 receptor agonistinjection deviceinjection processItalytime trade-offtype 2 diabetesutilityweekly injection

Identifiers

PMID29922043
PMCPMC5995299
OpenAlexW2807155949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.