Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29921989›Full record

ArticleThe journal of extra-corporeal technology2018

Integration of Electronic Perfusion Data for Perfusion Registries.

Richard F Newland, Robert A Baker, Chris A Barratt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of extra-corporeal technology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Richard F NewlandFlinders Medical Centre and Flinders University, Bedford Park, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Robert A BakerFlinders Medical Centre and Flinders University, Bedford Park, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Chris A BarrattFlinders Medical Centre and Flinders University, Bedford Park, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the potential for the utilization of electronic perfusion data (EPD) from proprietary software to facilitate the understanding and improvement of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) has been recognized, the generalizability of previous reports of EPD integration are limited by superceded software or lack of sufficient detail for reproducibility. To date, the Australian and New Zealand Collaborative Perfusion Registry (ANZCPR) is the only multicentre perfusion registry to have reported the integration of EPD. The inclusion of EPD in analyses of the impact of CPB on patient outcome is important in improving the understanding of CPB practice. Perfusion registries play an important role in this process, and the incorporation of EPD into perfusion registries could make a significant contribution toward this objective. By sharing the methodology used to integrate EPD from the CONNECT™ software into the ANZCPR, our intent is to diminish some of the barriers to adoption of EPD integration into other perfusion registries, by providing an example of how EPD integration may be achieved.

Indexed as

Cardiopulmonary BypassDatabase Management SystemsElectronic Health RecordsMyocardial ReperfusionRegistriesSoftwareAustraliaHumanscardiopulmonary bypassdatabasequality improvementregistry

Identifiers

PMID29921989
PMCPMC6002640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.