Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29921964›Full record

ArticleTranslational psychiatry2018

Neuroimaging-informed phenotypes of suicidal behavior: a family history of suicide and the use of a violent suicidal means.

Fabrice Jollant, Gerd Wagner, Stéphane Richard-Devantoy, Stefanie Köhler, Karl-Jürgen Bär, Gustavo Turecki, Fabricio Pereira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational psychiatry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A Brain-Centric Model of Suicidal Behavior.The American journal of psychiatry · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Fabrice JollantMcGill Group for Suicide Studies (MGSS), McGill University & Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montréal, Canada. fabrice.jollant@parisdescartes.fr.
Gerd WagnerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2296-0259
Stéphane Richard-DevantoyMcGill Group for Suicide Studies (MGSS), McGill University & Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montréal, Canada.
Stefanie KöhlerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Karl-Jürgen BärDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Gustavo TureckiMcGill Group for Suicide Studies (MGSS), McGill University & Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montréal, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4075-2736
Fabricio PereiraDepartment of Radiology, Academic Hospital (CHU) of Nîmes & Research Team EA2415, Nîmes, France.

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The identification of brain markers of suicidal risk is highly expected. However, neuroimaging studies have yielded mixed results, possibly due to phenotypic heterogeneity. In the present study, we addressed this issue using structural brain imaging. First, two independent samples of suicide attempters (n = 17 in Montreal, 32 in Jena), patient controls (n = 26/34), and healthy controls (n = 66/34) were scanned with magnetic resonance imaging. Groups were compared with FSL. We then reviewed the literature and run a GingerALE meta-analysis of 12 structural imaging studies comparing suicide attempters and patient controls with whole-brain analyses (n = 693). Finally, we explored the potential contribution of two variables previously associated with biological/cognitive deficits: a family history of suicide (FHoS), and the use of a violent suicidal means (VSM). Here, we added two groups of healthy first-degree biological relatives of suicide victims and depressed patients (n = 32). When comparing all suicide attempters and controls, very limited between-group differences were found in the two samples, and none in the meta-analysis. In contrast, a FHoS was associated with reduced volumes in bilateral temporal regions, right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, and left putamen, several of these differences being observed across groups. VSM was associated with increased bilateral caudate (and left putamen) volumes. Some morphometric variations in cortico-subcortical networks may therefore be endophenotypes increasing the suicidal vulnerability, while others (notably in striatum) may modulate action selection. These results therefore confirm at the neural level two phenotypes at high lethal risk with a strong biological background, and uncover motives of heterogeneous findings in neuroimaging studies of suicidal behavior.

Indexed as

Medical History TakingAdultBrainCase-Control StudiesEndophenotypesFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMeta-Analysis as TopicMiddle AgedNeuroimagingNeuropsychological TestsSuicide, AttemptedViolence

Identifiers

PMID29921964
PMCPMC6008434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.