ArticleEye (London, England)2018
Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty: surgical outcomes and endothelial cell count modelling from a UK centre.
Article in Eye (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep learning-assisted widefield endothelial imaging in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Rebubbling and graft detachment in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty using a standardised protocol.Eye (London, England) · 2023Article
- Clinical Outcomes of Descemet's Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty without Routine Prophylactic Peripheral Iridotomy.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Risk Factors for Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Rejection: Current Perspectives- Systematic Review.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023Review
- Descemet's Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty for Corneal Endothelial Failure Secondary to Three Types of Phakic Intraocular Lens - Retrospective Study.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023Article
- "Endothelium-Out" and "Endothelium-In" Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) Graft Insertion Techniques: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Article
- Changing trends in corneal transplantation: a national review of current practices in the Republic of Ireland.Irish journal of medical science · 2021Review
- How to Avoid an Upside-Down Orientation of the Graft during Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty?Journal of ophthalmology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo report surgical outcomes and endothelial cell density (ECD) trends up to 2 years post-operatively in the first cohort of eyes undergoing Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for low-to-moderate risk indications at our UK centre. Tight corneal sutures were used to ensure high intraoperative pressure from intracameral air for 10-min and to maintain a good post-operative air fill. Outcomes were compared to a prior series at our unit of similar eyes having Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK).
methodsRetrospective, interventional series. Inclusions: all DMEKs with a minimum of 1-month follow-up. EXCLUSIONS: prior glaucoma surgery, penetrating keratoplasty or anterior chamber lens.
results88 DMEKs met inclusion. Median follow-up: 332 days. Main indication: Fuchs dystrophy (90%). COMPLICATIONS: re-bubbling 2%, primary failure 6%, retinal detachment 2%, rejection 3%. At 3 months, BCVA ≥6/6 and ≥6/9 were 67% and 86%, respectively. Graft survival at both 1 and 2 years was 94 ± 2%. Mean(±SD) cell-loss at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months: 30 ± 15%, 29 ± 16%, 33 ± 17%, 35 ± 17% and 48 ± 16%, respectively. Compared to a prior series at our unit of 210 low-to-moderate risk DSEKs, cell loss was lower for DMEK at all time-points (p < 0.001) through to 12 months but was not statistically different at 24 months. Mixed-modelling of ECD over time demonstrated the convergence of DMEK and DSEK curves by 2 years.
conclusionsDMEK using tissue from UK eye-banks resulted in high survival and excellent visual acuity. ECD through 1 year was superior to DSEK in a similar cohort. Our low re-bubble rate (2%) may be attributable to use of intracameral air at temporarily elevated intraocular pressure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.