Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29921879›Full record

ArticleNPJ primary care respiratory medicine2018

Recruitment of patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) for research.

Jennifer K Quint, Elisabeth Moore, Adam Lewis, Maimoona Hashmi, Kirin Sultana, Mark Wright, Liam Smeeth, Lia Chatzidiakou, Roderic Jones, Sean Beevers and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ primary care respiratory medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Association between Inhaled βInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jennifer K QuintDepartment of Respiratory Epidemiology, Occupational Medicine & Public Health, Imperial College London, National Heart and Lung Institute, London, UK. j.quint@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-0149-4869
Elisabeth MooreDepartment of Respiratory Epidemiology, Occupational Medicine & Public Health, Imperial College London, National Heart and Lung Institute, London, UK.
Adam LewisDepartment of Respiratory Epidemiology, Occupational Medicine & Public Health, Imperial College London, National Heart and Lung Institute, London, UK.
Maimoona HashmiClinical Practice Research Datalink, Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, London, UK.
Kirin SultanaClinical Practice Research Datalink, Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, London, UK.
Mark WrightClinical Practice Research Datalink, Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, London, UK.
Liam SmeethDepartment of Epidemiology & Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Lia ChatzidiakouDepartment of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8753-1386
Roderic JonesDepartment of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Sean BeeversAnalytical & Environmental Sciences Division, King's College London, London, UK.
Sefki KolozaliAnalytical & Environmental Sciences Division, King's College London, London, UK.
Frank KellyNIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Health Impacts of Environmental Hazards, King's College London, London, UK.
Benjamin BarrattNIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Health Impacts of Environmental Hazards, King's College London, London, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council G0801056Medical Research Council MR/L01341X/1Medical Research Council MR/L019744/1Medical Research Council (MRC) MR/L019744/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Databases of electronic health records (EHR) are not only a valuable source of data for health research but have also recently been used as a medium through which potential study participants can be screened, located and approached to take part in research. The aim was to assess whether it is feasible and practical to screen, locate and approach patients to take part in research through the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD). This is a cohort study in primary care. The CPRD anonymised EHR database was searched to screen patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) to take part in a research study. The potential participants were contacted via their General Practitioner (GP) who confirmed their eligibility. Eighty two practices across Greater London were invited to the study. Twenty-six (31.7%) practices consented to participate resulting in a pre-screened list of 988 patients. Of these, 632 (63.7%) were confirmed as eligible following the GP review. Two hundred twenty seven (36%) response forms were received by the study team; 79 (34.8%) responded 'yes' (i.e., they wanted to be contacted by the research assistant for more information and to talk about enrolling in the study), and 148 (65.2%) declined participation. This study has shown that it is possible to use EHR databases such as CPRD to screen, locate and recruit participants for research. This method provides access to a cohort of patients while minimising input needed by GPs and allows researchers to examine healthcare usage and disease burden in more detail and in real-life settings.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsPatient SelectionPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveBiomedical ResearchHumans

Identifiers

PMID29921879
PMCPMC6008416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.