Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29921776›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2018

Trends and Knowledge Gaps in the Study of Nature-Based Participation by Latinos in the United States.

Pooja S Tandon, Lauren M Kuehne, Julian D Olden

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pooja S TandonCenter for Child Health, Behavior, and Development, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA 98121, USA. pooja@uw.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7180-838X
Lauren M KuehneSchool of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. lkuehne@uw.edu.
Julian D OldenSchool of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. olden@uw.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mounting evidence supports health and well-being benefits associated with nature experiences, while also highlighting race- and class-based inequalities in access and exposure. We synthesized the literature on nature contact by Latinos in the United States to assess the state of knowledge and strategically identify research needs to improve outcomes and reduce health disparities for this rapidly growing ethnic group. Our systematic review revealed 108 articles with a notable increase in number of papers over the past 3 decades. We noted that the body of research is focused on certain demographic targets (adults in urban areas) with a relative dearth of knowledge for others (children, seniors, and rural areas). Our analysis also revealed strong compartmentalizing of studies into research “clusters” based on nonoverlapping topics and types of outcomes that are measured. Although one-third of studies explored health outcomes, these studies rarely examined other outcomes or research topics. Moreover, less than 7% of studies reported on interventions. Given the potential for nature contact to enhance health and well-being, there is substantial need for multidisciplinary research that explores interactions between social, cultural, and economic factors, and how those ultimately relate to nature contact and outcomes for Latinos in the United States.

Indexed as

Health Status DisparitiesNatureHealth BehaviorHispanic or LatinoHumansLeisure ActivitiesUnited Statesgreenspacehealthnatureoutdoorsrecreation

Identifiers

PMID29921776
PMCPMC6025174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.