Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2018
Comparison of prostatic artery embolisation (PAE) versus transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for benign prostatic hyperplasia: randomised, open label, non-inferiority trial.
Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 119 papers, 15 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Prostatic Artery Embolization vs. Conventional Transurethral Prostatectomy in the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Prospective Randomized Trial
Transurethral Prostate Resection (TURP) vs. Prostate Artery Embolization (PAE): Open Multicentric Randomized Study for Evaluation of Outcomes, Complications, and Health Economics
Who cites it
119 citing papers in PubMed, 15 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 291 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reintervention rates after minimally invasive benign prostatic hyperplasia therapies: a systematic review including industry involvement.World journal of urology · 2025Pooled it
- Transurethral resection of the prostate across continents: a meta-analysis evaluating quality of gold standard in the twenty-first century.World journal of urology · 2025Pooled it
- Evaluating transurethral resection of the prostate over twenty years: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.World journal of urology · 2024Pooled it
- Pooled it
- [Minimally invasive treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia : The German S2e guideline 2023-part 4].Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024Guideline
- Are all procedures for benign prostatic hyperplasia created equal? A systematic review on post-procedural PSA dynamics and its correlation with relief of bladder outlet obstruction.World journal of urology · 2022Pooled it
- Prostatic arterial embolization for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Minimally invasive treatments for lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia: a network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of prostatic artery embolization for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.European radiology · 2021Pooled it
- Prostatic Artery Embolization for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Health Technology Assessment.Ontario health technology assessment series · 2021Pooled it
- Prostatic arterial embolization for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- A Systematic Review of Reported Ejaculatory Dysfunction in Clinical Trials Evaluating Minimally Invasive Treatment Modalities for BPH.Current urology reports · 2020Pooled it
- An updated meta-analysis of prostatic arterial embolization versus transurethral resection of the prostate in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.World journal of urology · 2020Pooled it
- Transurethral resection of the prostate versus prostatic artery embolization in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a meta-analysis.BMC urology · 2019Pooled it
- Novel minimally invasive treatments for lower urinary tract symptoms: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of UrologyPooled it
- Trial
- Prostatic Artery Embolization Versus Transurethral Resection of the Prostate: A Post Hoc Cost Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2021Trial
- [Prostate artery embolization-2026 update : Technique, evidence, and role in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Central gland detachment following prostate artery embolization: incidence, risk factors and clinical outcomes.CVIR endovascular · 2026Article
- Review
59 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare prostatic artery embolisation (PAE) with transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia in terms of patient reported and functional outcomes.
designRandomised, open label, non-inferiority trial.
settingUrology and radiology departments of a Swiss tertiary care centre.
participants103 patients aged ≥40 years with refractory lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia were randomised between 11 February 2014 and 24 May 2017; 48 and 51 patients reached the primary endpoint 12 weeks after PAE and TURP, respectively.
interventionsPAE performed with 250-400 μm microspheres under local anaesthesia versus monopolar TURP performed under spinal or general anaesthesia. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary outcome was change in international prostate symptoms score (IPSS) from baseline to 12 weeks after surgery; a difference of less than 3 points between treatments was defined as non-inferiority for PAE and tested with a one sided
resultsMean reduction in IPSS from baseline to 12 weeks was -9.23 points after PAE and -10.77 points after TURP. Although the difference was less than 3 points (1.54 points in favour of TURP (95% confidence interval -1.45 to 4.52)), non-inferiority of PAE could not be shown (P=0.17). None of the patient reported secondary outcomes differed significantly between treatments when tested for superiority; IPSS also did not differ significantly (P=0.31). At 12 weeks, PAE was less effective than TURP regarding changes in maximum rate of urinary flow (5.19
conclusionsThe improvement in lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia seen 12 weeks after PAE is close to that after TURP. PAE is associated with fewer complications than TURP but has disadvantages regarding functional outcomes, which should be considered when selecting patients. Further comparative study findings, including longer follow-up, should be evaluated before PAE can be considered as a routine treatment.
trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT02054013.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.