Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29921323›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2018

Can diffusion-weighted imaging predict tumor grade and expression of Ki-67 in breast cancer? A multicenter analysis.

Alexey Surov, Paola Clauser, Yun-Woo Chang, Lihua Li, Laura Martincich, Savannah C Partridge, Jin You Kim, Hans Jonas Meyer, Andreas Wienke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Hybrid [Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Breast Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging: Current Applications, Insights from Screening, and Future Directions.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Non-contrast Breast MR Imaging.Radiologic clinics of North America · 2024
    Review
  18. Calcium-Sensing Receptor Expression in Breast Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alexey SurovDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany. alexey.surov@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.ORCID 0000-0002-9273-3943
Paola ClauserDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel, 18-20 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Yun-Woo ChangDepartment of Radiology, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, 59 Daesakwan-ro, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, 140-743, Republic of Korea.
Lihua LiInstitute of Biomedical Engineering and Instrumentation, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, China.
Laura MartincichUnit of Radiology, Institute for Cancer Research and Treatment of Candiolo (IRCC), Strada Provinciale 142, 10060 Candiolo, Turin, Italy.
Savannah C PartridgeDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington, 825 Eastlake Avenue E, G2-600, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA.
Jin You KimDepartment of Radiology, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine and Medical Research Institute, 1-10, Ami-Dong, Seo-gu, Busan, 602-739, Korea.
Hans Jonas MeyerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Andreas WienkeInstitute of Medical Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Informatics, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Magdeburger Strasse, 06097, Halle, Germany.

Funding

MR Diffusion Tensor Imaging for Detection and Characterization of Breast LesionsR01CA151326 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI PARTRIDGE, SAVANNAH CORRINA · 2010 to 2014
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA151326
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNumerous studies have analyzed associations between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and histopathological features such as Ki-67 proliferation index in breast cancer (BC), with mixed results. The purpose of this study was to perform a multicenter analysis to determine relationships between ADC and expression of Ki-67 and tumor grade in BC.

methodsFor this study, data from six centers were acquired. The sample comprises 870 patients (all female; mean age, 52.6 ± 10.8 years). In every case, breast magnetic resonance imaging with diffusion-weighted imaging was performed. The comparison of ADC values in groups was performed by Mann-Whitney U test where the p values are adjusted for multiple testing (Bonferroni correction). The association between ADC and Ki-67 values was calculated by Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. Sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values, accuracy, and AUC were calculated for the diagnostic procedures. ADC thresholds were chosen to maximize the Youden index.

resultsOverall, data of 870 patients were acquired for this study. The mean ADC value of the tumors was 0.98 ± 0.22 × 10

conclusionsADC cannot be used as a surrogate marker for proliferation activity and/or for tumor grade in breast cancer.

Indexed as

Diffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsCell ProliferationFemaleHumansKi-67 AntigenMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingStatistics, NonparametricKi-67 AntigenADCBreast cancerDWIKi-67

Identifiers

PMID29921323
PMCPMC6011203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.