Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29921227›Full record

ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2018

Anchored phylogenomics illuminates the skipper butterfly tree of life.

Emmanuel F A Toussaint, Jesse W Breinholt, Chandra Earl, Andrew D Warren, Andrew V Z Brower, Masaya Yago, Kelly M Dexter, Marianne Espeland, Naomi E Pierce, David J Lohman and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Genomic DNA sequencing reveals two new North American species ofThe taxonomic report of the International Lepidoptera Survey · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Emmanuel F A ToussaintFlorida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, 32611, USA. Emmanuel.touss1@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-8439-1285
Jesse W BreinholtFlorida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, 32611, USA.
Chandra EarlFlorida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, 32611, USA.
Andrew D WarrenFlorida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, 32611, USA.
Andrew V Z BrowerEvolution and Ecology Group, Department of Biology, Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, TN, 37132, USA.
Masaya YagoThe University Museum, The University of Tokyo, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan.
Kelly M DexterFlorida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, 32611, USA.
Marianne EspelandArthropoda Department, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, Adenauer Allee 160, 53113, Bonn, Germany.
Naomi E PierceDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA.
David J LohmanBiology Department, City College of New York, City University of New York, New York, NY, 10031, USA.
Akito Y KawaharaFlorida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, 32611, USA.

Funding

National Science Foundation 1541557
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundButterflies (Papilionoidea) are perhaps the most charismatic insect lineage, yet phylogenetic relationships among them remain incompletely studied and controversial. This is especially true for skippers (Hesperiidae), one of the most species-rich and poorly studied butterfly families.

methodsTo infer a robust phylogenomic hypothesis for Hesperiidae, we sequenced nearly 400 loci using Anchored Hybrid Enrichment and sampled all tribes and more than 120 genera of skippers. Molecular datasets were analyzed using maximum-likelihood, parsimony and coalescent multi-species phylogenetic methods.

resultsAll analyses converged on a novel, robust phylogenetic hypothesis for skippers. Different optimality criteria and methodologies recovered almost identical phylogenetic trees with strong nodal support at nearly all nodes and all taxonomic levels. Our results support Coeliadinae as the sister group to the remaining skippers, the monotypic Euschemoninae as the sister group to all other subfamilies but Coeliadinae, and the monophyly of Eudaminae plus Pyrginae. Within Pyrginae, Celaenorrhinini and Tagiadini are sister groups, the Neotropical firetips, Pyrrhopygini, are sister to all other tribes but Celaenorrhinini and Tagiadini. Achlyodini is recovered as the sister group to Carcharodini, and Erynnini as sister group to Pyrgini. Within the grass skippers (Hesperiinae), there is strong support for the monophyly of Aeromachini plus remaining Hesperiinae. The giant skippers (Agathymus and Megathymus) once classified as a subfamily, are recovered as monophyletic with strong support, but are deeply nested within Hesperiinae.

conclusionsAnchored Hybrid Enrichment sequencing resulted in a large amount of data that built the foundation for a new, robust evolutionary tree of skippers. The newly inferred phylogenetic tree resolves long-standing systematic issues and changes our understanding of the skipper tree of life. These resultsenhance understanding of the evolution of one of the most species-rich butterfly families.

Indexed as

GenomicsPhylogenyAnimalsBase SequenceButterfliesLikelihood FunctionsSpecies SpecificityAnchored hybrid enrichmentButterfly phylogenomicsCoalescent multi-speciesHesperiidaeLepidopteraMaximum likelihoodMolecular systematicsPapilionoideaParsimonyTarget capture

Identifiers

PMID29921227
PMCPMC6011192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.