ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2018
Tissue-Specific Analysis of Pharmacological Pathways.
Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Complement C3 deficient mice show more severe imiquimod-induced psoriasiform dermatitis than wild-type mice regardless of the commensal microbiota.Experimental animals · 2024Article
- SAFER: sub-hypergraph attention-based neural network for predicting effective responses to dose combinations.BMC bioinformatics · 2024Article
- SAFER: sub-hypergraph attention-based neural network for predicting effective responses to dose combinations.Research square · 2024Article
- The Ramp Atlas: facilitating tissue and cell-specific ramp sequence analyses through an intuitive web interface.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Toward modeling metabolic state from single-cell transcriptomics.Molecular metabolism · 2022Review
- Informatics and Computational Methods in Natural Product Drug Discovery: A Review and Perspectives.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding the downstream consequences of pharmacologically targeted proteins is essential to drug design. Current approaches investigate molecular effects under tissue-naïve assumptions. Many target proteins, however, have tissue-specific expression. A systematic study connecting drugs to target pathways in in vivo human tissues is needed. We introduced a data-driven method that integrates drug-target relationships with gene expression, protein-protein interaction, and pathway annotation data. We applied our method to four independent genomewide expression datasets and built 467,396 connections between 1,034 drugs and 954 pathways in 259 human tissues or cell lines. We validated our results using data from L1000 and Pharmacogenomics Knowledgebase (PharmGKB), and observed high precision and recall. We predicted and tested anticoagulant effects of 22 compounds experimentally that were previously unknown, and used clinical data to validate these effects retrospectively. Our systematic study provides a better understanding of the cellular response to drugs and can be applied to many research topics in systems pharmacology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.