Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29920518›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2018

The immunosuppressive face of sepsis early on intensive care unit-A large-scale microarray meta-analysis.

Dominik Schaack, Benedikt Hermann Siegler, Sandra Tamulyte, Markus Alexander Weigand, Florian Uhle

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Early Biomarker Signatures in Surgical Sepsis.The Journal of surgical research · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dominik SchaackDepartment of Anesthesiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, Heidelberg, Germany.
Benedikt Hermann SieglerDepartment of Anesthesiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, Heidelberg, Germany.
Sandra TamulyteDepartment of Anesthesiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, Heidelberg, Germany.
Markus Alexander WeigandDepartment of Anesthesiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, Heidelberg, Germany.
Florian UhleDepartment of Anesthesiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8876-7430
Heidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSepsis is defined as a life-threatening condition, resulting from a dysregulated and harmful response of the hosts' immune system to infection. Apart from this, the (over-)compensating mechanisms counterbalancing the inflammatory response have been proven to render the host susceptible to further infections and increase delayed mortality. Our study aimed to unravel the heterogeneity of immune response in early sepsis and to explain the biology behind it.

methodsA systematic search of public repositories yielded 949 microarray samples from patients with sepsis of different infectious origin and early after clinical manifestation. These were merged into a meta-expression set, and after applying sequential conservative bioinformatics filtering, an in-deep analysis of transcriptional heterogeneity, as well as a comparison to samples of healthy controls was performed.

resultsWe can identify two distinct clusters of patients (cluster 1: 655 subjects, cluster 2: 294 subjects) according to their global blood transcriptome. While both clusters exhibit only moderate differences in direct comparison, a comparison of both clusters individually to healthy controls yielded strong expression changes of genes involved in immune responses. Both comparisons found similar regulated genes, with a stronger dysregulation occurring in the larger patient cluster and implicating a loss of monocyte and T cell function, co-occurring with an activation of neutrophil granulocytes.

conclusionWe propose a consistent-but in its extent varying-presence of immunosuppression, occurring as early in sepsis as its clinical manifestation and irrespective of the infectious origin. While certain cell types possess contradictory activation states, our finding underlines the urgent need for an early host-directed therapy of sepsis side-by-side with antibiotics.

Indexed as

Antigens, CDCluster AnalysisCytokinesGene Expression RegulationGene Regulatory NetworksGranulocytesHaptoglobinsHumansInflammasomesMonocytesSepsisTissue Array AnalysisT-Lymphocyte SubsetsTranscriptomeAntigens, CDCytokinesHaptoglobinsHP protein, humanInflammasomes

Identifiers

PMID29920518
PMCPMC6007920
OpenAlexW2809330325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.