ReviewToxicology letters2018
Biological monitoring of workers exposed to engineered nanomaterials.
Review in Toxicology letters, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Occupational Safety and Health Staging Framework for Decent Work.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- A Biomonitoring Pilot Study in Workers from a Paints Production Plant Exposed to Pigment-Grade Titanium Dioxide (TiOToxics · 2022Article
- Towards a toxic-free environment: perspectives for chemical risk assessment approaches.La Medicina del lavoro · 2022Article
- Toxicological Aspects of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022Article
- Producers of Engineered Nanomaterials-What Motivates Company and Worker Participation in Biomonitoring Programs?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Weight of epidemiological evidence for titanium dioxide risk assessment: current state and further needs.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2020Review
- Comparative analysis of lung and blood transcriptomes in mice exposed to multi-walled carbon nanotubes.Toxicology and applied pharmacology · 2020Article
- Nanoparticles: An Experimental Study of Zinc Nanoparticles Toxicity on Marine Crustaceans. General Overview on the Health Implications in Humans.Frontiers in public health · 2020Article
- An Exploratory Assessment of Applying Risk Management Practices to Engineered Nanomaterials.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Article
- The reference values in the interpretation of toxicological data.La Medicina del lavoro · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As the number of nanomaterial workers increase there is need to consider whether biomonitoring of exposure should be used as a routine risk management tool. Currently, no biomonitoring of nanomaterials is mandated by authoritative or regulatory agencies. However, there is a growing knowledge base to support such biomonitoring, but further research is needed as are investigations of priorities for biomonitoring. That research should be focused on validation of biomarkers of exposure and effect. Some biomarkers of effect are generally nonspecific. These biomarkers need further interpretation before they should be used. Overall biomonitoring of nanomaterial workers may be important to supplement risk assessment and risk management efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.