Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29920146›Full record

ArticleLGBT health2018

Perceived Gender Presentation Among Transgender and Gender Diverse Youth: Approaches to Analysis and Associations with Bullying Victimization and Emotional Distress.

Amy L Gower, G Nicole Rider, Eli Coleman, Camille Brown, Barbara J McMorris, Marla E Eisenberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in LGBT health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Sibling Support for Transgender and Gender-Diverse Youth: A Scoping Review.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Amy L Gower1 Division of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Health, Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota , Minneapolis, Minnesota.
G Nicole Rider2 Program in Human Sexuality, Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota Medical School , Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Eli Coleman2 Program in Human Sexuality, Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota Medical School , Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Camille Brown1 Division of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Health, Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota , Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Barbara J McMorris3 Center for Adolescent Nursing, School of Nursing, University of Minnesota , Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Marla E Eisenberg1 Division of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Health, Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota , Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Funding

Minnesota Population Center Science and Technical CoreP2CHD041023 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI THERESA LOUISE OSYPUK · 2016 to 2026
$4.3M
Health needs of gender variant youth: A mixed-methods studyR21HD088757 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI EISENBERG, MARLA E. · 2016 to 2017
$402k
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD041023NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD088757
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAs measures of birth-assigned sex, gender identity, and perceived gender presentation are increasingly included in large-scale research studies, data analysis approaches incorporating such measures are needed. Large samples capable of demonstrating variation within the transgender and gender diverse (TGD) community can inform intervention efforts to improve health equity. A population-based sample of TGD youth was used to examine associations between perceived gender presentation, bullying victimization, and emotional distress using two data analysis approaches.

methodsThis secondary data analysis of the Minnesota Student Survey included 2168 9th and 11th graders who identified as "transgender, genderqueer, genderfluid, or unsure about their gender identity." Youth reported their biological sex, how others perceived their gender presentation, experiences of four forms of bullying victimization, and four measures of emotional distress. Logistic regression and multifactor analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to compare and contrast two analysis approaches.

resultsLogistic regressions indicated that TGD youth perceived as more gender incongruent had higher odds of bullying victimization and emotional distress relative to those perceived as very congruent with their biological sex. Multifactor ANOVAs demonstrated more variable patterns and allowed for comparisons of each perceived presentation group with all other groups, reflecting nuances that exist within TGD youth.

conclusionResearchers should adopt data analysis strategies that allow for comparisons of all perceived gender presentation categories rather than assigning a reference group. Those working with TGD youth should be particularly attuned to youth perceived as gender incongruent as they may be more likely to experience bullying victimization and emotional distress.

Indexed as

AdolescentBullyingCrime VictimsData Interpretation, StatisticalFemaleGender DysphoriaHumansMaleMinnesotaStress, PsychologicalStudentsSurveys and QuestionnairesTransgender Personsadolescencebullyinggender identitymental healthperceived gender presentation

Identifiers

PMID29920146
PMCPMC6034394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.