ArticleThe Journal of physiology2018
A structurally derived model of subunit-dependent NMDA receptor function.
Article in The Journal of physiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of allosteric N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor modulation by GluN2A-selective antagonists using pharmacological equilibrium modeling.Molecular pharmacology · 2025Article
- Mechanisms of Action Underlying Conductance-Modifying Positive Allosteric Modulators of the NMDA Receptor.Molecular pharmacology · 2024Article
- Subtype-specific conformational landscape of NMDA receptor gating.Cell reports · 2024Article
- De novo GRIN variants in M3 helix associated with neurological disorders control channel gating of NMDA receptor.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2024Article
- Selective Cell-Surface Expression of Triheteromeric NMDA Receptors.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Characterizing Functional Contributions of Specific GluN2 Subunits to Individual Postsynaptic NMDAR Responses Using Biophysical Parameters.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Functional effects of disease-associated variants reveal that the S1-M1 linker of the NMDA receptor critically controls channel opening.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2023Article
- Two gates mediate NMDA receptor activity and are under subunit-specific regulation.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Complex functional phenotypes of NMDA receptor disease variants.Molecular psychiatry · 2022Article
- DeepGANnel: Synthesis of fully annotated single molecule patch-clamp data using generative adversarial networks.PloS one · 2022Article
- Allosteric antagonist action at triheteromeric NMDA receptors.Neuropharmacology · 2022Review
- Role of NMDAR plasticity in a computational model of synaptic memory.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Structure, Function, and Pharmacology of Glutamate Receptor Ion Channels.Pharmacological reviews · 2021Review
- Three-dimensional missense tolerance ratio analysis.Genome research · 2021Article
- NMDARs, Coincidence Detectors of Astrocytic and Neuronal Activities.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- The Negative Allosteric Modulator EU1794-4 Reduces Single-Channel Conductance and CaMolecular pharmacology · 2021Article
- NMDA Receptors Require Multiple Pre-opening Gating Steps for Efficient Synaptic Activity.Neuron · 2021Article
- From bedside-to-bench: What disease-associated variants are teaching us about the NMDA receptor.The Journal of physiology · 2021Review
- Hodgkin-Huxley-Katz Prize Lecture: Genetic and pharmacological control of glutamate receptor channel through a highly conserved gating motif.The Journal of physiology · 2020Article
- NMDA receptor channel gating control by the pre-M1 helix.The Journal of general physiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
key pointsThe kinetics of NMDA receptor (NMDAR) signalling are a critical aspect of the physiology of excitatory synaptic transmission in the brain. Here we develop a mechanistic description of NMDAR function based on the receptor tetrameric structure and the principle that each agonist-bound subunit must undergo some rate-limiting conformational change after agonist binding, prior to channel opening. By fitting this mechanism to single channel data using a new MATLAB-based software implementation of maximum likelihood fitting with correction for limited time resolution, rate constants were derived for this mechanism that reflect distinct structural changes and predict the properties of macroscopic and synaptic NMDAR currents. The principles applied here to develop a mechanistic description of the heterotetrameric NMDAR, and the software used in this analysis, can be equally applied to other heterotetrameric glutamate receptors, providing a unifying mechanistic framework to understanding the physiology of glutamate receptor signalling in the brain. ABSTRACT: NMDA receptors (NMDARs) are tetrameric complexes comprising two glycine-binding GluN1 and two glutamate-binding GluN2 subunits. Four GluN2 subunits encoded by different genes can produce up to 10 different di- and triheteromeric receptors. In addition, some neurological patients contain a de novo mutation or inherited rare variant in only one subunit. There is currently no mechanistic framework to describe tetrameric receptor function that can be extended to receptors with two different GluN1 or GluN2 subunits. Here we use the structural features of glutamate receptors to develop a mechanism describing both single channel and macroscopic NMDAR currents. We propose that each agonist-bound subunit undergoes some rate-limiting conformational change after agonist binding, prior to channel opening. We hypothesize that this conformational change occurs within a triad of interactions between a short helix preceding the M1 transmembrane helix, the highly conserved M3 motif encoded by the residues SYTANLAAF, and the linker preceding the M4 transmembrane helix of the adjacent subunit. Molecular dynamics simulations suggest that pre-M1 helix motion is uncorrelated between subunits, which we interpret to suggest independent subunit-specific conformational changes may influence these pre-gating steps. According to this interpretation, these conformational changes are the main determinants of the key kinetic properties of NMDA receptor activation following agonist binding, and so these steps sculpt their physiological role. We show that this structurally derived tetrameric model describes both single channel and macroscopic data, giving a new approach to interpreting functional properties of synaptic NMDARs that provides a logical framework to understanding receptors with non-identical subunits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.