Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29917104›Full record

ArticleGigaScience2018

Binning enables efficient host genome reconstruction in cnidarian holobionts.

Juan Sebastián Celis, Daniel Wibberg, Catalina Ramírez-Portilla, Oliver Rupp, Alexander Sczyrba, Anika Winkler, Jörn Kalinowski, Thomas Wilke

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GigaScience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The genome of the mustard hill coral,GigaByte (Hong Kong, China) · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Juan Sebastián CelisAnimal Ecology and Systematics, Justus Liebig University Giessen. Heinrich-Buff-Ring 26-32 (IFZ), 35392 Giessen, Germany.
Daniel WibbergCenter for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University, Universitätsstraße 27, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany.
Catalina Ramírez-PortillaAnimal Ecology and Systematics, Justus Liebig University Giessen. Heinrich-Buff-Ring 26-32 (IFZ), 35392 Giessen, Germany.
Oliver RuppBioinformatics and Systems Biology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 58, 35392 Giessen, Germany.
Alexander SczyrbaCenter for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University, Universitätsstraße 27, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany.
Anika WinklerCenter for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University, Universitätsstraße 27, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany.
Jörn KalinowskiCenter for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University, Universitätsstraße 27, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany.
Thomas WilkeAnimal Ecology and Systematics, Justus Liebig University Giessen. Heinrich-Buff-Ring 26-32 (IFZ), 35392 Giessen, Germany.
Bielefeld University · DEJustus-Liebig-Universität Gießen · DEUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Many cnidarians, including stony corals, engage in complex symbiotic associations, comprising the eukaryotic host, photosynthetic algae, and highly diverse microbial communities-together referred to as holobiont. This taxonomic complexity makes sequencing and assembling coral host genomes extremely challenging. Therefore, previous cnidarian genomic projects were based on symbiont-free tissue samples. However, this approach may not be applicable to the majority of cnidarian species for ecological reasons. We therefore evaluated the performance of an alternative method based on sequence binning for reconstructing the genome of the stony coral Porites rus from a hologenomic sample and compared it to traditional approaches. Results: Our results demonstrate that binning performs well for hologenomic data, producing sufficient reads for assembling the draft genome of P. rus. An assembly evaluation based on operational criteria showed results that were comparable to symbiont-free approaches in terms of completeness and usefulness, despite a high degree of fragmentation in our assembly. In addition, we found that binning provides sufficient data for exploratory k-mer estimation of genomic features, such as genome size and heterozygosity. Conclusions: Binning constitutes a powerful approach for disentangling taxonomically complex coral hologenomes. Considering the recent decline of coral reefs on the one hand and previous limitations to coral genome sequencing on the other hand, binning may facilitate rapid and reliable genome assembly. This study also provides an important milestone in advancing binning from the metagenomic to the hologenomic and from the prokaryotic to the eukaryotic level.

Indexed as

GenomeAlgorithmsAnimalsAnthozoaCnidariaComputational BiologyCoral ReefsDNAEcologyGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMetagenomicsPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNASymbiosisDNARNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID29917104
PMCPMC6049006
OpenAlexW2809673375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.