Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29916807›Full record

ArticleeLife2018

Proteolytic maturation of α

Laurent Ferron, Ivan Kadurin, Annette C Dolphin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Pathophysiological Roles of Auxiliary Calcium Channel αHandbook of experimental pharmacology · 2023
    Article
  3. Involvement of CaThe Journal of physiology · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The life cycle of voltage-gated CaNeuronal signaling · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Electrophysiological Profile RemodelingFrontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  15. The calcium channel subunit αNature communications · 2019
    Article
  16. Disruption of the Key CaCell reports · 2019
    Article
  17. Deletion of the CaFrontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  18. The αCell reports · 2018
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Laurent FerronDepartment of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2547-7417
Ivan KadurinDepartment of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Annette C DolphinDepartment of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4626-4856

Funding

Medical Research Council G0901758Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 098360/Z/12/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Auxiliary α

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, NewbornBiological TransportCalcium Channels, N-TypeGene ExpressionGenes, ReporterHippocampusImmunoprecipitationLuminescent ProteinsNeuronsPrimary Cell CultureProbabilityProtein SubunitsProteolysisRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyCacna1b protein, ratCalcium Channels, N-TypeLuminescent ProteinsProtein SubunitsRed Fluorescent Proteinalpha2Delta subunitcalcium channelneuroscienceproteolytic processingratsynaptic transmissionvesicular release

Identifiers

PMID29916807
PMCPMC6029843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.