Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29916803›Full record

ArticleMicrobial genomics2018

Genome analysis of methicillin resistance in Macrococcus caseolyticus from dairy cattle in England and Wales.

Alison C MacFadyen, Elizabeth A Fisher, Ben Costa, Cassie Cullen, Gavin K Paterson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial genomics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Research Progress onPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. First fatal human bloodstream infection caused byFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Effects ofMetabolites · 2025
    Article
  4. Evidence ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Genus-wide genomic characterization ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Methicillin-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Molecular Epidemiology ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Typing ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alison C MacFadyen1​Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies and The Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Elizabeth A Fisher2​School of Life Sciences, University of Hull, Kingston upon Hull, UK.
Ben Costa2​School of Life Sciences, University of Hull, Kingston upon Hull, UK.
Cassie Cullen2​School of Life Sciences, University of Hull, Kingston upon Hull, UK.
Gavin K Paterson1​Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies and The Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Species of the genus Macrococcus are widespread commensals of animals but are becoming increasingly recognised as veterinary pathogens. They can encode methicillin resistance and are implicated in its spread to the closely-related, but more pathogenic, staphylococci. In this study we have identified 33 isolates of methicillin-resistant Macrococcus caseolyticus from bovine bulk tank milk from England and Wales. These isolates were characterised to provide insight into the molecular epidemiology of M. caseolyticus and to discern the genetic basis for their methicillin resistance. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed by Vitek2 and disc diffusion. Isolates were whole-genome sequenced to evaluate phylogenetic relationships and the presence of methicillin resistance determinants, mecA-D. All 33 isolates were phenotypically methicillin-resistant according to cefoxitin disc diffusion, cefoxitin Etest and oxacillin resistance assessed by Vitek2. In contrast only a single isolate was resistant in the Vitek2 cefoxitin screen. Twenty-seven isolates were positive for mecD and six were positive for mecB. mecA and mecC were not detected. The results of phylogenetic analysis indicated that these methicillin-resistant isolates represented a heterogeneous population with both mecB and mecD found in diverse isolates. Isolates had a widespread distribution across the sampled region. Taken together with the role of M. caseolyticus in veterinary infections, including bovine mastitis, and in the potential spread of methicillin resistance to more pathogenic staphylococci, this work highlights the need to better understand their epidemiology and for increased awareness among veterinary microbiology laboratories.

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialPhylogenyAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCattleEnglandFemaleMastitis, BovineMethicillin ResistanceMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMilkStaphylococcaceaeWalesAnti-Bacterial Agentsmacrococcimec genesmethicillin resistancestaphylococciveterinary microbiology

Identifiers

PMID29916803
PMCPMC6159548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.