Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29916720›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2018

Early and delayed phases of contrast-enhanced CT for evaluating patients with malignant pleural effusion. Results of pairwise comparison by multiple observers.

Juan José Arenas-Jiménez, Elena García-Garrigós, Carmen Escudero-Fresneda, Marina Sirera-Matilla, Irene García-Pastor, Alberto Quirce-Vázquez, Mariana Planells-Alduvin

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Malignant pleural disease.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Diagnostics in Pleural Disease.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Juan José Arenas-Jiménez1 Department of Radiology, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria y Biómedica de Alicante (ISABIAL) - FISABIO Hospital General Universitario de Alicante , Alicante , Spain.
Elena García-Garrigós1 Department of Radiology, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria y Biómedica de Alicante (ISABIAL) - FISABIO Hospital General Universitario de Alicante , Alicante , Spain.
Carmen Escudero-Fresneda2 Department of Radiology, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante , Alicante , Spain.
Marina Sirera-Matilla2 Department of Radiology, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante , Alicante , Spain.
Irene García-Pastor2 Department of Radiology, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante , Alicante , Spain.
Alberto Quirce-Vázquez2 Department of Radiology, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante , Alicante , Spain.
Mariana Planells-Alduvin2 Department of Radiology, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante , Alicante , Spain.
Hospital General Universitario de Alicante Doctor Balmis · ESFundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare images from early and delayed phases of contrast-enhanced thoracic CT for assessing pleural thickening or nodules in a series of patients with malignant pleural effusions.

methodsBlinded images from 36 patients with malignant pleural effusions showing pleural lesions in both early (35 s delayed) and delayed (70 s delayed) phases of thoracic and abdominal contrast-enhanced CT scan were retrospectively assessed by six observers. First, images were individually scored in a six-point scale grading the quality of visualization of pleural findings such as pleural thickening or nodules. This was followed by a paired analysis, where the readers had to choose the one showing the highest quality between two images presented together corresponding to both phases of the same patient showing the same pleural lesion. When possible, contrast attenuation of the abnormal pleura was measured. Statistical analysis was performed by using paired t-test and χ

resultsMean attenuation of pleural lesions was significantly higher in the delayed phase (76.0 ± 25.1 vs 57.5 ± 20.7, p < 0.001). Mean score and score of individual images was statistically significant better for the delayed phase for all observers. In the paired analysis, all the readers preferred the delayed phase over the early phase in 77.8 to 91.7% of the cases.

conclusionDelayed phase of contrast-enhanced CT is preferable to early phase for evaluating pleural findings. Advances in knowledge: Pleural attenuation is greater for the delayed phase compared with the early phase of contrast-enhanced chest CT. In the pairwise comparison, all the observers prefer the delayed phase over the early phase for pleural evaluation.

Indexed as

Tomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPleuraPleural DiseasesPleural Effusion, MalignantRetrospective StudiesTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID29916720
PMCPMC6223142
OpenAlexW2808832958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.