Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29916366›Full record

ArticleeLife2018

Antibiotic-induced changes in the microbiota disrupt redox dynamics in the gut.

Aspen T Reese, Eugenia H Cho, Bruce Klitzman, Scott P Nichols, Natalie A Wisniewski, Max M Villa, Heather K Durand, Sharon Jiang, Firas S Midani, Sai N Nimmagadda and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 101 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
101citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

101 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Metabolic engineering ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Frontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  9. Antibiotic-induced microbiota depletion impairs the proregenerative response to a biological scaffold.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

41 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Aspen T ReeseDepartment of Biology, Duke University, Durham, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9004-9470
Eugenia H ChoDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States.
Bruce KlitzmanDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, United States.
Scott P NicholsProfusa, Inc., South San Francisco, United States.
Natalie A WisniewskiProfusa, Inc., South San Francisco, United States.
Max M VillaDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University, Durham, United States.
Heather K DurandDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University, Durham, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4059-8484
Sharon JiangDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University, Durham, United States.
Firas S MidaniProgram in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2473-7758
Sai N NimmagaddaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1837-4054
Thomas M O'ConnellDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, United States.
Justin P WrightDepartment of Biology, Duke University, Durham, United States.
Marc A DeshussesDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Duke University, Durham, United States.
Lawrence A DavidDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University, Durham, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3570-4767

Funding

PILOT AND FEASIBILITY STUDIESP30DK034987 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ROBERT S. SANDLER · 1985 to 2026
$30.5M
National Gnotobiotic Rodent Resource CenterP40OD010995 · OD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Ryan B Sartor · 2012 to 2026
$9.7M
Computational Biology and Bioinformatics Training ProgramT32GM071340 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MAGWENE, PAUL MITAARI · 2005 to 2020
$3.3M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK034987NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM071340NIH HHS P40 OD010995
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How host and microbial factors combine to structure gut microbial communities remains incompletely understood. Redox potential is an important environmental feature affected by both host and microbial actions. We assessed how antibiotics, which can impact host and microbial function, change redox state and how this contributes to post-antibiotic succession. We showed gut redox potential increased within hours of an antibiotic dose in mice. Host and microbial functioning changed under treatment, but shifts in redox potentials could be attributed specifically to bacterial suppression in a host-free ex vivo human gut microbiota model. Redox dynamics were linked to blooms of the bacterial family Enterobacteriaceae. Ecological succession to pre-treatment composition was associated with recovery of gut redox, but also required dispersal from unaffected gut communities. As bacterial competition for electron acceptors can be a key ecological factor structuring gut communities, these results support the potential for manipulating gut microbiota through managing bacterial respiration.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsApolipoproteins AEnterobacteriaceaeFecesGastrointestinal MicrobiomeGastrointestinal TractGene Expression RegulationHumansLipocalin-2MaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNF-kappa BNitric Oxide Synthase Type IIOxidation-ReductionAnti-Bacterial Agentsapolipoprotein A-IVApolipoproteins ALipocalin-2NF-kappa BNitric Oxide Synthase Type IINos2 protein, mouseRela protein, mouseTranscription Factor RelAantibioticsgut microbiotahumaninfectious diseasemicrobiologymouseredox potentialsuccession

Identifiers

PMID29916366
PMCPMC6008055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.