ReviewSports medicine - open2018
The what and how of video analysis research in rugby union: a critical review.
Review in Sports medicine - open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Paving the path for injury prevention in rugby-7s: A systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of sport science · 2024Pooled it
- Quantifying Collision Frequency and Intensity in Rugby Union and Rugby Sevens: A Systematic Review.Sports medicine - open · 2022Pooled it
- 3D Biomechanics of Rugby Tackle Techniques to Inform Future Rugby Research Practice: a Systematic Review.Sports medicine - open · 2021Pooled it
- Article
- Falling and Landing Framework (FLF): A Consensus on a Novel Falling and Landing Video Analysis Framework for Use Across Rugby Codes.European journal of sport science · 2025Article
- Tackle Height and Tackle Success-An Analysis of 52,204 Tackle Events.European journal of sport science · 2025Article
- The Performance Demands and Technical Determinants for Tackle and Ruck Success During the Pool and Knockout Stages of the Men's International World Rugby Sevens Series.European journal of sport science · 2025Article
- E-concussion? an investigation of the representation of head impact events and concussion within popular sport-based video games.PloS one · 2025Article
- Are we tackle ready? Cross-sectional video analysis of match tackle characteristics in elite women's Rugby Union.European journal of sport science · 2024Article
- How to harness and improve on video analysis for youth rugby player safety: a narrative review.BMJ open sport & exercise medicine · 2023Review
- Consensus on a jockey's injury prevention framework for video analysis: a modified Delphi study.BMJ open sport & exercise medicine · 2022Article
- An Extensive Comparative Analysis of Successful and Unsuccessful Football Teams in LaLiga.Frontiers in psychology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundVideo analysis is a common tool used in rugby union research to describe match performance. Studies using video analysis range from broad statistical studies of commercial databases to in-depth case-studies of specific match events. The range of types of studies using video analysis in rugby union, and how different studies apply the methodology, can make it difficult to compare the results of studies and translate the findings to a real-world setting. In attempt to consolidate the information on video analysis in rugby, a critical review of the literature was performed. MAIN BODY: Ninety-two studies were identified. The studies were categorised based on the outcome of the study and the type of research question, sub-categorised as 'what' and 'how' studies. Each study was reviewed using a number of questions related to the application of video analysis in research. There was a large range in the sample sizes of the studies reviewed, with some of the studies being under-powered. Concerns were raised of the generalisability of some of the samples. One hundred percent of 'how' studies included at least one contextual variables in their analyses, with 86% of 'how' studies including two or more contextual variables. These findings show that the majority of studies describing how events occur in matches attempted to provide context to their findings. The majority of studies (93%) provided practical applications for their findings.
conclusionThe review raised concerns about the usefulness of the some of the findings to coaches and practitioners. To facilitate the transfer and adoption of research findings into practice, the authors recommend that the results of 'what' studies inform the research questions of 'how' studies, and the findings of 'how' studies provide the practical applications for coaches and practitioners.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.