Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29916004›Full record

ReviewZeitschrift fur Rheumatologie2018

[Collagenosis and vasculitis-what is allowed in treatment?]

F Moosig, J Holle

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 94% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

F MoosigRheumazentrum Schleswig-Holstein Mitte, Kuhberg 5a-7, 24534, Neumünster, Deutschland. moosig@rheuma-sh.de.
J HolleRheumazentrum Schleswig-Holstein Mitte, Kuhberg 5a-7, 24534, Neumünster, Deutschland.
Friedrich-Ebert-Krankenhaus · DERheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There has been a substantial improvement in treatment options for rheumatic diseases due to the approval of many new drugs. This general trend is also observable in rare diseases, which are predominant in the field of vasculitis and collagenosis, albeit in a lesser form; however, the usually high costs of new drugs lead to increased scrutiny of prescriptions by health insurances. Many of the medications used do not have an official approval for these indications, so that use outside the approval, a so-called off-label use, must often be strived for. Whereas this often does not occur with conventional immunosuppressive drugs due to the comparatively low risk of recourse, in many situations cost coverage for an off-label use should be requested in advance for biologicals.

Indexed as

Biological ProductsRheumatic DiseasesVasculitisDrug ApprovalHumansOff-Label UseBiological ProductsBiologicalsCostsImmunosuppressive drugsMedicationsOff-label use

Identifiers

PMID29916004
OpenAlexW2809587137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.