ReviewCurrent osteoporosis reports2018
Mechanical Characterization of Bone: State of the Art in Experimental Approaches-What Types of Experiments Do People Do and How Does One Interpret the Results?
Review in Current osteoporosis reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Scaffold Design: A Review of Material and Immune Modulation in Bone Tissue Engineering.Cell and tissue banking · 2026Review
- Cow's Milk Positively Impacts Bone Formation by Regulating the Osteocalcin Pathway Compared to Transgenic and Non-Transgenic Soy-Based Beverages in BALB/c Mice.Molecular nutrition & food research · 2026Article
- Modifications to the gut microbiome alter bone matrix proteomics and fracture toughness at the cellular scale.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Cortical bone mechanics technology signal quality maintains robustness across a range of biometric profiles.JBMR plus · 2025Article
- Effects of Thermal Environment on Bone Microenvironment: A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Toward Fully Automated Personalized Orthopedic Treatments: Innovations and Interdisciplinary Gaps.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Article
- Recent Methods for Modifying Mechanical Properties of Tissue-Engineered Scaffolds for Clinical Applications.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- New Horizons: Artificial Intelligence Tools for Managing Osteoporosis.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2023Article
- Percutaneous-Reinforced Osteoplasty: A Review of Emerging Treatment Strategies for Bone Interventions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Bone Density Micro-CT Assessment during Embedding of the Innovative Multi-Spiked Connecting Scaffold in Periarticular Bone to Elaborate a Validated Numerical Model for Designing Biomimetic Fixation of Resurfacing Endoprostheses.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Biomechanical Properties of Metastatically Involved Osteolytic Bone.Current osteoporosis reports · 2020Review
- In Vivo Assessment of Cortical Bone Fragility.Current osteoporosis reports · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewThe mechanical integrity of bone is determined by the direct measurement of bone mechanical properties. This article presents an overview of the current, most common, and new and upcoming experimental approaches for the mechanical characterization of bone. The key outcome variables of mechanical testing, as well as interpretations of the results in the context of bone structure and biology are also discussed. RECENT
findingsQuasi-static tests are the most commonly used for determining the resistance to structural failure by a single load at the organ (whole bone) level. The resistance to crack initiation or growth by fracture toughness testing and fatigue loading offers additional and more direct characterization of tissue material properties. Non-traditional indentation techniques and in situ testing are being increasingly used to probe the material properties of bone ultrastructure. Destructive ex vivo testing or clinical surrogate measures are considered to be the gold standard for estimating fracture risk. The type of mechanical test used for a particular investigation depends on the length scale of interest, where the outcome variables are influenced by the interrelationship between bone structure and composition. Advancement in the sensitivity of mechanical characterization techniques to detect changes in bone at the levels subjected to modifications by aging, disease, and/or pharmaceutical treatment is required. As such, a number of techniques are now available to aid our understanding of the factors that contribute to fracture risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.