Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29915962›Full record

Trial reportPsychopharmacology2018

No side-effects of single intranasal oxytocin administration in middle childhood.

Martine W F T Verhees, Janne Houben, Eva Ceulemans, Marian J Bakermans-Kranenburg, Marinus H van IJzendoorn, Guy Bosmans

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychopharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Oxytocin as an adolescent treatment for methamphetamine addiction after early life stress in male and female rats.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Article
  7. Roles of Oxytocin in Stress Responses, Allostasis and Resilience.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Martine W F T VerheesParenting and Special Education Research Unit, KU Leuven, Leopold Vanderkelenstraat 32, 3000, Leuven, Belgium. martine.verhees@kuleuven.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7471-6341
Janne HoubenParenting and Special Education Research Unit, KU Leuven, Leopold Vanderkelenstraat 32, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Eva CeulemansQuantitative Psychology and Individual Differences Research Unit, KU Leuven, Tiensestraat 102, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Marian J Bakermans-KranenburgCentre for Child and Family Studies, Leiden University, Wassenaarseweg 52, 2333 AK, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Marinus H van IJzendoornDepartment of Psychology, Education and Child Studies, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, 3062 PA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Guy BosmansParenting and Special Education Research Unit, KU Leuven, Leopold Vanderkelenstraat 32, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
KU Leuven · BELeiden University · NLUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek G.0757.18Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek G.0774.15KU Leuven CREA/12/004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite growing interest in the (therapeutic) use of intranasal oxytocin administration in children, the potential side-effects of intranasal oxytocin have remained largely unclear to date. The current study is the first double-blind randomized controlled trial to examine side-effects following single administration of oxytocin nasal spray in elementary school-aged children.

methodsOne hundred children (8-12 years old) were randomly assigned to receive oxytocin or placebo nasal spray. We assessed side-effects by means of a standardized, drug-specific questionnaire and an open-ended question at two time points: 90 min after nasal spray administration and 24 h after administration.

resultsThere were no significant associations between nasal spray condition and total frequency of reported side-effects or reports of specific side-effects. Children and their mothers were unable to correctly guess nasal spray allocation, further supporting that the subjective experience of oxytocin versus placebo nasal spray effects was similar. Moreover, the majority of reported side-effects were classified as mild and ceased within 24 h after the procedure, indicating that the nasal sprays were well tolerated.

conclusionIn all, this study is the first randomized controlled trial to provide information on the safety of intranasal oxytocin administration in middle childhood. The current study suggests that single administration of intranasal oxytocin is likely safe in elementary school-aged children.

Indexed as

Nasal SpraysAdministration, IntranasalChildDouble-Blind MethodDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleHumansMaleOxytocicsOxytocinSurveys and QuestionnairesNasal SpraysOxytocicsOxytocinIntranasal administrationMiddle childhoodOxytocinRandomized controlled trialSide-effects

Identifiers

PMID29915962
OpenAlexW2809302091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.