Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29915942›Full record

SynthesisJournal of digital imaging2018

3D Segmentation Algorithms for Computerized Tomographic Imaging: a Systematic Literature Review.

L E Carvalho, A C Sobieranski, A von Wangenheim

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of digital imaging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A new segment method for pulmonary artery and vein.Health information science and systems · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

L E CarvalhoGraduate Program in Computer Science - Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, Brazil. lcarvalho@incod.ufsc.br.ORCID 0000-0003-2052-1279
A C SobieranskiImage Processing and Computer Graphics Lab - National Brazilian Institute for Digital Convergence - Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, Brazil.
A von WangenheimGraduate Program in Computer Science - Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper presents a systematic literature review concerning 3D segmentation algorithms for computerized tomographic imaging. This analysis covers articles published in the range 2006-March 2018 found in four scientific databases (Science Direct, IEEEXplore, ACM, and PubMed), using the methodology for systematic review proposed by Kitchenham. We present the analyzed segmentation methods categorized according to its application, algorithmic strategy, validation, and use of prior knowledge, as well as its general conceptual description. Additionally, we present a general overview, discussions, and further prospects for the 3D segmentation methods applied for tomographic images.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalTomography, X-Ray Computed3D segmentationComputerized tomographic imagingKitchenham’s systematic reviewSegmentation methods categorization

Identifiers

PMID29915942
PMCPMC6261188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.