Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29915935›Full record

ArticleSkeletal radiology2018

CT-guided transforaminal epidural steroid injections: do needle position and degree of foraminal stenosis affect the pattern of epidural flow?

Nityanand Miskin, Glenn C Gaviola, Varand Ghazikhanian, Jacob C Mandell

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Skeletal radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nityanand MiskinDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. nmiskin@partners.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5651-310X
Glenn C GaviolaDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Varand GhazikhanianDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Jacob C MandellDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the effect of needle position and foraminal stenosis on contrast flow directionality during CT-guided transforaminal epidural steroid injections (TFESI). MATERIALS AND

methodsOne hundred five consecutive CT-guided injections were performed in 68 patients (mean age, 65.5 years) from January 1 to December 31 2017, all with preceding MRI. Two readers independently reviewed CT images to assess needle position and to determine direction of contrast flow, which was defined as central or peripheral. The MRIs were independently reviewed by the readers to determine the degree of foraminal stenosis. Inter-reader agreement for both was evaluated with the kappa statistic. Analyses were performed to determine effect of needle position, degree of foraminal stenosis, and volume of contrast injected with directionality of contrast flow, and association between contrast flow directionality with immediate post-procedural pain scores.

resultsCentral direction of contrast flow was demonstrated in 41/78 (52.6%) of cases with posterolateral needle position, and 20/27 (74.1%) with central or anteromedial needle position (p = 0.07). There was no difference in direction of contrast flow with high-grade versus absence of high-grade neuroforaminal narrowing, or with volume of contrast injected. There was no difference in immediate post-procedure pain scores regardless of contrast flow directionality.

conclusionsNeedle position is not significantly associated with contrast flow directionality during CT-guided TFESI, although there was a trend towards relatively decreased central flow with posterolateral positioning. Degree of foraminal stenosis and volume of injected contrast did not affect contrast flow directionality. There was no difference in immediate post-procedural pain scores with either direction of contrast flow.

Indexed as

Injections, EpiduralAdultAgedAnesthetics, LocalBack PainContrast MediaFemaleHumansIohexolLidocaineMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPain ManagementPain MeasurementRadiography, InterventionalAnesthetics, LocalContrast MediaIohexolLidocaineSteroidsCT guidanceEpiduralInjectionsInterventionSpineTransforaminal

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.