ArticlePeerJ2018
Epidemiology of
Article in PeerJ, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of antimicrobial susceptibility of Glaesserella parasuis from different pig production systems in Taiwan between 2015 and 2020.Porcine health management · 2025Article
- Article
- Ribosomal protein L32 contributes to the growth, antibiotic resistance and virulence ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2024Article
- Matrine reverses the resistance ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Assessment of the Macrophage Scavenger Receptor CD163 in MediatingVeterinary sciences · 2023Article
- Rapid Visual Detection ofTransboundary and emerging diseases · 2023Article
- Methylome and Transcriptome-Based Integration Analysis Identified Molecular Signatures Associated With Meningitis Induced byFrontiers in immunology · 2022Article
- Article
- Article
- Characterization and protective activity of monoclonal antibodies directed against Fe (3+) ABC transporter substrate-binding protein of Glaesserella parasuis.Veterinary research · 2021Article
- Evidence for Establishing the Clinical Breakpoint of Cefquinome against Haemophilus Parasuis in China.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Proteome Analysis of Outer Membrane Vesicles From a Highly Virulent Strain ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2021Article
- Pigs Overexpressing Porcine β-Defensin 2 Display Increased Resilience toAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Serotyping and pathotyping of Glaesserella parasuis isolated 2012-2019 in Germany comparing different PCR-based methods.Veterinary research · 2020Article
- Polyamine Transport Protein PotD Protects Mice againstVaccines · 2019Article
- Association betweenPeerJ · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background
methodsWe characterized 143
resultsSerotyping revealed serovar 5 as the most prevalent (26.6%) followed by serovars 4 (22.4%), 7 (9.1 %), 13 (6.3%), 12 (5.6 %), and non-typeable (8.4%). In a panel of 23 antimicrobials, the minimum inhibitory concentration 50% (MIC DISCUSSION: These
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.