Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29915535›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2018

The Therapeutic Efficacy of Danhong Injection Combined With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Jun-Bo Zou, Xiao-Fei Zhang, Jing Wang, Fang Wang, Jiang-Xue Cheng, Fang-Yan Yang, Xiao Song, Yu Wang, Yu-Lin Liang, Ya-Jun Shi

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Compatibility of ingredients of Danshen (RadixExperimental and therapeutic medicine · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2019
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jun-Bo ZouCollege of Pharmacy, Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang, China.
Xiao-Fei ZhangCollege of Pharmacy, Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang, China.
Jing WangCollege of Pharmacy, Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang, China.
Fang WangKey Laboratory of Modern Preparation of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Ministry of Education, Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, China.
Jiang-Xue ChengCollege of Pharmacy, Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang, China.
Fang-Yan YangCollege of Pharmacy, Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang, China.
Xiao SongCollege of Pharmacy, Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang, China.
Yu WangCollege of Pharmacy, Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang, China.
Yu-Lin LiangCollege of Pharmacy, Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang, China.
Ya-Jun ShiCollege of Pharmacy, Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang, China.
Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine · CNJiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

acute coronary syndromeDanhong injectionmeta-analysispercutaneous coronary interventionsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID29915535
PMCPMC5994407
OpenAlexW2800565817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.