Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29915509›Full record

ArticleVeterinary world2018

Improvising livestock service in hilly regions through indigenous wisdom towards control of tick infestation: Institutional relationships.

Khumaji Badaji Kataviya, Bharat Parmar, Ramesh Patel, Pranab Jyoti Das, Vivek Kumar, Amit Mahajan, Ravinder Singh, Devesh Thakur, Amol Kinhekar, R K Ravikumar and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary world, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 93% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Khumaji Badaji KataviyaNational Innovation Foundation-India, Amarapur, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India.
Bharat ParmarNational Innovation Foundation-India, Amarapur, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India.
Ramesh PatelSociety for Research and Initiatives for Sustainable Technologies and Institutions, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Pranab Jyoti DasNational Innovation Foundation-India, Amarapur, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India.
Vivek KumarNational Innovation Foundation-India, Amarapur, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India.
Amit MahajanDepartment of Animal Husbandry, Sirmaur, Himachal Pradesh, India.
Ravinder SinghDepartment of Animal Husbandry, Sirmaur, Himachal Pradesh, India.
Devesh ThakurDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Husbandry Extension, Dr. GC Negi College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Palampur, Himachal Pradesh, India.
Amol KinhekarNIF Cell, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
R K RavikumarNIF Cell, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
Vipin KumarNational Innovation Foundation-India, Amarapur, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India.
National Innovation Foundation · INKerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University · INSociety for Research and Initiatives for Sustainable Technologies and Institutions · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThis study was conducted to demonstrate the acaricide efficacy of novel indigenous veterinary medication shared by an outstanding knowledge holder against naturally infested cattle and efforts in mainstreaming such wisdom. MATERIALS AND

methodsAn indigenous herbal medication in control of tick infestation was documented, and experimentation was held against naturally affected cattle. Eighteen clinically infested cattle population comprising 16 crossbred and 2 non-descript cattle were purposively selected. Majority of them were adult females, reported with a higher incidence of tick at Veterinary institution. The average pre-treatment tick count at 24 sites of observations among these animals was 18.91±2.04 (Mean [x̄]±standard error [SE]). The medication was topically applied once daily for 2 days and post-treatment observations were recorded for an experimental period of 14 days' duration.

resultsDuring 24-h post-treatment observation, the medication had shown 92.95% acaricidal property with clinically irrelevant rate of tick infestation of 1.33±0.39 (x̄ ±SE) was noticed before application of subsequent (second) dosage. This practice was found significantly effective at 5% level of significance (t

conclusionThe study strengthens the belief that indigenous herbal acaricide can facilitate quality livestock service at geographically distant locations. These medications can provide quicker relief, minimize tick resistance and are favorable to the environment.

Indexed as

acaricideindigenousinstitutionlivestockruminanttick

Identifiers

PMID29915509
PMCPMC5993760
OpenAlexW2803511182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.