ReviewThe Indian journal of surgery2018
Anastomotic Failure in Colorectal Surgery: Where Are We at?
Review in The Indian journal of surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Life outcomes of being born with anorectal malformation: a systematic review of intersectional reporting, mental health co-morbidities, and psychosocial experiences in adulthood.Pediatric surgery international · 2026Pooled it
- Anastomotic leakage in colorectal cancer surgery in Syria: risk factors and improvements following guideline implementation - a retrospective cohort study.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Improved outcomes with cyanoacrylate glue for ileocolic anastomosis in right colectomy: a multicenter study.Annals of coloproctology · 2025Article
- Ex Vivo and Simulation Comparison of Leakage in End-to-End Versus End-to-Side Anastomosed Porcine Large Intestine.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage Following Stoma Closure: A Retrospective Study in Tertiary Hospitals in Yemen.Cureus · 2024Article
- Development of an Anisotropic Hyperelastic Material Model for Porcine Colorectal Tissues.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Reconstruction, oversewing, or taking the anastomosis down - which surgical intervention is most potent in the treatment of anastomotic leaks following colorectal resections?Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2023Article
- Left hemicolectomy and low anterior resection in colorectal cancer patients: Knight-griffen vs. transanal purse-string suture anastomosis with no-coil placement.Frontiers in surgery · 2023Article
- No Coil® placement in patients undergoing left hemicolectomy and low anterior resection for colorectal cancer.World journal of surgical oncology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anastomotic leak (AL) can be a devastating complication in colorectal surgery. While it is less frequent in the modern era, it still results in significant morbidity and mortality, prolonged hospital stays and increases the costs and demands on health services. There is inevitable interplay between patient physiology and technical factors that predispose a patient to AL. Obesity, preoperative total proteins, male gender, ongoing anticoagulant treatment, intraoperative complication and number of hospital beds have been identified as independent risk factors. This has led to an online risk calculator for AL. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy have also been implicated, but no significant evidence has yet been found to support causation. In addition, technical factors such as type of anastomosis, mechanical bowel preparation, drains, omentoplasty and faecal diversion have failed to show significant differences in AL rates. Early diagnosis and intervention in AL is essential in reducing the rates of morbidity and mortality. Clinical assessment has high sensitivity but low specificity and should be used in combination with imaging techniques to get a diagnosis. C-reactive protein is also a useful marker. The management will depend on the grade of AL and the clinical state of the patient. Management options include conservative measures such as antibiotics and/or percutaneous drainage to more invasion procedures such as open drainage and/or Hartmann's procedure. In conclusion, ALs will forever pose challenges to the surgeon in diagnosis and management. It is often the yardstick by which each surgeon is measured and is the source of significant morbidity to patients and health care services worldwide. As a result, a low threshold for investigation and intervention is mandatory to ensure better outcomes and lower overall mortality and morbidity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.