ReviewPediatric research2018
Defining outcomes following congenital diaphragmatic hernia using standardised clinical assessment and management plan (SCAMP) methodology within the CDH EURO consortium.
Review in Pediatric research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical morbidity of primary versus patch repaired congenital diaphragmatic hernia patients.Scientific reports · 2021Pooled it
- Intraindividual development of MR lung perfusion parameters in children after congenital diaphragmatic hernia at 2 and 10 years.European radiology · 2026Article
- Fetal Pulmonary Vascular Assessment and Its Association with Postnatal Ductus Arteriosus Flow in Infants with a Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia.Fetal diagnosis and therapy · 2026Article
- Cardiac function in children with congenital diaphragmatic hernia: cardiac strain at birth and at 2-5 weeks of age.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- Long-Term Evaluation of the Shape of the Reconstructed Diaphragm in Patients with Left-Sided Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Using Serial Chest Radiographs and Correlation to Further Complications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Long-term follow-up of patients with congenital diaphragmatic hernia.World journal of pediatric surgery · 2024Review
- Editorial: Unsolved problems in congenital diaphragmatic hernia.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Article
- Evidence-Based Genetic Testing for Individuals with Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia.The Journal of pediatrics · 2022Article
- Parent-Reported Perceived Cognitive Functioning Identifies Cognitive Problems in Children Who Survived Neonatal Critical Illness.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Congenital diaphragmatic hernia.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2022Review
- Underlying genetic etiologies of congenital diaphragmatic hernia.Prenatal diagnosis · 2022Review
- A Strangulated Congenital Diaphragmatic Bochdalek Hernia Diagnosed in an Adult.Case reports in medicine · 2022Article
- Unsolved problems in CDH follow-up.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Article
- Recurrence of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia: Risk Factors, Management, and Future Perspectives.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Article
- Longitudinal Follow-Up With Radiologic Screening for Recurrence and Secondary Hiatal Hernia in Neonates With Open Repair of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia-A Large Prospective, Observational Cohort Study at One Referral Center.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2021Article
- ATS Core Curriculum 2020. Pediatric Pulmonary Medicine.ATS scholar · 2020Article
- Letter to the Editor concerning Schmedding et al.: Decentralised surgery of abdominal wall defects in Germany (Pediatr Surg Int (2020) 36:569-578).Pediatric surgery international · 2020Article
- A parent-reported standardised checklist is not sensitive to screen for motor problems at school age following neonatal critical illness.Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) · 2020Article
- Pediatric ECMO Research: The Case for Collaboration.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 11 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Treatment modalities for neonates born with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) have greatly improved in recent times with a concomitant increase in survival. In 2008, CDH EURO consortium, a collaboration of a large volume of CDH centers in Western Europe, was established with a goal to standardize management and facilitate multicenter research. However, limited knowledge on long-term outcomes restricts the identification of optimal care pathways for CDH survivors in adolescence and adulthood. This review aimed to evaluate the current practice of long-term follow-up within the CDH EURO consortium centers, and to review the literature on long-term outcomes published from 2000 onward. Apart from having disease-specific morbidities, children with CDH are at risk for impaired neurodevelopmental problems and failure of educational attainments which may affect participation in society and the quality of life in later years. Thus, there is every reason to offer them long-term multidisciplinary follow-up programs. We discuss a proposed collaborative project using standardized clinical assessment and management plan (SCAMP) methodology to obtain uniform and standardized follow-up of CDH patients at an international level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.