ArticleScientific reports2018
Development of a computer-aided tool for the pattern recognition of facial features in diagnosing Turner syndrome: comparison of diagnostic accuracy with clinical workers.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimization and evaluation of facial recognition models for Williams-Beuren syndrome.European journal of pediatrics · 2024Article
- Computer-aided diagnostic screen for Congenital Central Hypoventilation Syndrome with facial phenotype.Pediatric research · 2024Article
- Facial recognition technology: regulations, rights and the rule of law.Frontiers in big data · 2024Article
- Article
- Current and Future Advances in Surgical Therapy for Pituitary Adenoma.Endocrine reviews · 2023Article
- Review on Facial-Recognition-Based Applications in Disease Diagnosis.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Facial Recognition Intensity in Disease Diagnosis Using Automatic Facial Recognition.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Article
- Changes in Computer-Analyzed Facial Expressions with Age.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Clinical application of an automatic facial recognition system based on deep learning for diagnosis of Turner syndrome.Endocrine · 2021Article
- Automatic Facial Recognition of Williams-Beuren Syndrome Based on Deep Convolutional Neural Networks.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2021Article
- Efficacy of intelligent diagnosis with a dynamic uncertain causality graph model for rare disorders of sex development.Frontiers of medicine · 2020Article
- What Are Important Ethical Implications of Using Facial Recognition Technology in Health Care?AMA journal of ethics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Technologies applied for the recognition of facial features in diagnosing certain disorders seem to be promising in reducing the medical burden and improve the efficiency. This pilot study aimed to develop a computer-assisted tool for the pattern recognition of facial features for diagnosing Turner syndrome (TS). Photographs of 54 patients with TS and 158 female controls were collected from July 2016 to May 2017. Finally, photographs of 32 patients with TS and 96 age-matched controls were included in the study that were further divided equally into training and testing groups. The process of automatic classification consisted of image preprocessing, facial feature extraction, feature reduction and fusion, automatic classification, and result presentation. A total of 27 physicians and 21 medical students completed a web-based test including the same photographs used in computer testing. After training, the automatic facial classification system for diagnosing TS achieved a 68.8% sensitivity and 87.5% specificity (and a 67.6% average sensitivity and 87.9% average specificity after resampling), which was significantly higher than the average sensitivity (57.4%, P < 0.001) and specificity (75.4%, P < 0.001) of 48 participants, respectively. The accuracy of this system was satisfactory and better than the diagnosis by clinicians. However, the system necessitates further improvement for achieving a high diagnostic accuracy in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.