ArticleScientific reports2018
No yield penalty under favorable conditions paving the way for successful adoption of flood tolerant rice.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Waterlogging and hypoxia in plant abiotic stress.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Exploring Flooding Challenges, Causes, and Mitigation Strategies in Rice.International journal of genomics · 2026Review
- Genome resources for three modern cotton lines guide future breeding efforts.Nature plants · 2024Article
- Overcoming barriers to adapt rice farming to recurring flash floods in haor wetlands of Bangladesh.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Development of a phenotyping protocol for combined drought and salinity stress at seedling stage in rice.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Principles of Nanoparticle Design for Genome Editing in Plants.Frontiers in genome editing · 2022Article
- Genetic gain for rice yield in rainfed environments in India.Field crops research · 2021Article
- Gender focused training and knowledge enhances the adoption of climate resilient seeds.Technology in society · 2020Article
- Genetic strategies for improving crop yields.Nature · 2019Review
- Marker Assisted Breeding to Develop Multiple Stress Tolerant Varieties for Flood and Drought Prone Areas.Rice (New York, N.Y.) · 2019Article
- Submergence and Waterlogging Stress in Plants: A Review Highlighting Research Opportunities and Understudied Aspects.Frontiers in plant science · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Flooding is one of the major constraints for rice production in rainfed lowlands, especially in years and areas of high rainfall. Incorporating the Sub1 (Submergence1) gene into high yielding popular varieties has proven to be the most feasible approach to sustain rice production in submergence-prone areas. Introgression of this QTL into popular varieties has resulted in considerable improvement in yield after flooding. However, its impact under non-flooded conditions or years have not been thoroughly evaluated which is important for the farmers to accept and adopt any new version of their popular varieties. The present study was carried out to evaluate the effect of Sub1 on grain yield of rice in different genetic backgrounds, under non-submergence conditions, over years and locations. The study was carried out using head to head trials in farmer's fields, which enable the farmers to more accurately compare the performance of Sub1 varieties with their recurrent parents under own management. The data generated from different head to head trials revealed that the grain yield of Sub1 varieties was either statistically similar or higher than their non-Sub1 counterparts under non-submergence conditions. Thus, Sub1 rice varieties show no instance of yield penalty of the introgressed gene.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.