Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29915302›Full record

ArticleNature communications2018

High-resolution crossover mapping reveals similarities and differences of male and female recombination in maize.

Penny M A Kianian, Minghui Wang, Kristin Simons, Farhad Ghavami, Yan He, Stefanie Dukowic-Schulze, Anitha Sundararajan, Qi Sun, Jaroslaw Pillardy, Joann Mudge and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. High-resolution global recombination mapping inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Molecular mechanisms and regulation of recombination frequency and distribution in plants.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024
    Review
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Penny M A KianianDepartment of Horticultural Science, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, 55108, USA. kiani002@umn.edu.
Minghui WangSection of Plant Biology, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.
Kristin SimonsDepartment of Plant Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, 58102, USA.
Farhad GhavamiDepartment of Plant Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, 58102, USA.
Yan HeSection of Plant Biology, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.
Stefanie Dukowic-SchulzeDepartment of Horticultural Science, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, 55108, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2675-1075
Anitha SundararajanNational Center for Genome Resources, Santa Fe, NM, 87505, USA.
Qi SunBioinformatics Facility, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.
Jaroslaw PillardyBioinformatics Facility, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.
Joann MudgeNational Center for Genome Resources, Santa Fe, NM, 87505, USA.
Changbin ChenDepartment of Horticultural Science, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, 55108, USA.
Shahryar F KianianUSDA-ARS, Cereal Disease Laboratory, St. Paul, MN, 55108, USA. kiani001@umn.edu.
Wojciech P PawlowskiSection of Plant Biology, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA. wp45@cornell.edu.
Cornell University · USUniversity of Minnesota · USNational Center for Genome Resources · USCereal Disease Laboratory · USNational Research Council Institute for Biodiagnostics · CANorth Dakota State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Meiotic crossovers (COs) are not uniformly distributed across the genome. Factors affecting this phenomenon are not well understood. Although many species exhibit large differences in CO numbers between sexes, sex-specific aspects of CO landscape are particularly poorly elucidated. Here, we conduct high-resolution CO mapping in maize. Our results show that CO numbers as well as their overall distribution are similar in male and female meioses. There are, nevertheless, dissimilarities at local scale. Male and female COs differ in their locations relative to transcription start sites in gene promoters and chromatin marks, including nucleosome occupancy and tri-methylation of lysine 4 of histone H3 (H3K4me3). Our data suggest that sex-specific factors not only affect male-female CO number disparities but also cause fine differences in CO positions. Differences between male and female CO landscapes indicate that recombination has distinct implications for population structure and gene evolution in male and in female meioses.

Indexed as

Crossing Over, GeneticChromosome MappingOvulePollenPromoter Regions, GeneticZea mays

Identifiers

PMID29915302
PMCPMC6006299
OpenAlexW2807769204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.