Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29915187›Full record

ArticleNature methods2018

EASI-tag enables accurate multiplexed and interference-free MS2-based proteome quantification.

Sebastian Virreira Winter, Florian Meier, Christoph Wichmann, Juergen Cox, Matthias Mann, Felix Meissner

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature methods, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. All-in-One Pseudo-MSJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Deep Learning Based MS2 Feature Detection for Data-Independent Shotgun Proteomics.Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sebastian Virreira WinterDepartment of Proteomics and Signal Transduction, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2299-8110
Florian MeierDepartment of Proteomics and Signal Transduction, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4729-175X
Christoph WichmannComputational Systems Biochemistry, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany.
Juergen CoxComputational Systems Biochemistry, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8597-205X
Matthias MannDepartment of Proteomics and Signal Transduction, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany. mmann@biochem.mpg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1292-4799
Felix MeissnerExperimental Systems Immunology, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany. meissner@biochem.mpg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1000-7989

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We developed EASI-tag (easily abstractable sulfoxide-based isobaric-tag), a new type of amine-derivatizing and sulfoxide-containing isobaric labeling reagents for highly accurate quantitative proteomics analysis using mass spectrometry. We observed that EASI-tag labels dissociate at low collision energy and generate peptide-coupled, interference-free reporter ions with high yield. Efficient isolation of

Indexed as

Mass SpectrometryChemical FractionationChromatography, LiquidComputational BiologyHeLa CellsHumansIonsProteomeProteomicsStaining and LabelingIonsProteome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.