ArticleScientific reports2018
Direct current stimulation of endothelial monolayers induces a transient and reversible increase in transport due to the electroosmotic effect.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed.
- Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines (2017-2025: An update) - endorsed by the European Society for Brain Stimulation (ESBS) and by the International Federation for Clinical Neurophysiology (IFCN).Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Review
- Transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) in human motor Optimization: Mechanisms, safety, and emerging applications.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2025Review
- An Integrated Microcurrent Delivery System Facilitates Human Parathyroid Hormone Delivery for Enhancing Osteoanabolic Effect.Small methods · 2025Article
- Understanding the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on the neurovascular unit: a narrative review.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Review
- Cytoskeletal Remodeling and Gap Junction Translocation Mediates Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption by Non-invasive Low-Voltage Pulsed Electric Fields.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2024Article
- Less might be more: 1 mA but not 1.5 mA of tDCS improves tactile orientation discrimination.IBRO neuroscience reports · 2023Article
- Breaking barriers: exploring mechanisms behind opening the blood-brain barrier.Fluids and barriers of the CNS · 2023Review
- Multi-scale multi-physics model of brain interstitial water flux by transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.Journal of neural engineering · 2023Article
- Is blood-brain barrier a probable mediator of non-invasive brain stimulation effects on Alzheimer's disease?Communications biology · 2023Review
- Neuroprotection and Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation: Facts or Fiction?International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Direct current stimulation modulates gene expression in isolated astrocytes with implications for glia-mediated plasticity.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Electric Fields Induced in the Brain by Transcranial Electric Stimulation: A Review of In Vivo Recordings.Biomedicines · 2022Review
- Experience-dependent associations between distinct subtypes of childhood trauma and brain function and architecture.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2022Article
- Effects of central nervous system electrical stimulation on non-neuronal cells.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Review
- Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Alleviates Neurovascular Unit Dysfunction in Mice With Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022Article
- Dataset of concurrent EEG, ECG, and behavior with multiple doses of transcranial electrical stimulation.Scientific data · 2021Article
- Personalised, image-guided, noninvasive brain stimulation in gliomas: Rationale, challenges and opportunities.EBioMedicine · 2021Review
- Special Issue on Professor John M. Tarbell's Contribution to Cardiovascular Engineering.Cardiovascular engineering and technology · 2021Article
- Direct current electric field regulates endothelial permeability under physiologically relevant fluid forces in a microfluidic vessel bifurcation model.Lab on a chip · 2021Article
- Group and individual level variations between symmetric and asymmetric DLPFC montages for tDCS over large scale brain network nodes.Scientific reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We investigated the effects of direct current stimulation (DCS) on fluid and solute transport across endothelial cell (EC) monolayers in vitro. Our motivation was transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) that has been investigated for treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders, to enhance neurorehabilitation, and to change cognition in healthy subjects. The mechanisms underlying this diversity of applications remain under investigation. To address the possible role of blood-brain barrier (BBB) changes during tDCS, we applied direct current to cultured EC monolayers in a specially designed chamber that generated spatially uniform direct current. DCS induced fluid and solute movement across EC layers that persisted only for the duration of the stimulation suggesting an electroosmosis mechanism. The direction of induced transport reversed with DCS polarity - a hallmark of the electroosmotic effect. The magnitude of DCS-induced flow was linearly correlated to the magnitude of the applied current. A mathematical model based on a two-pore description of the endothelial transport barrier and a Helmholtz model of the electrical double layer describes the experimental data accurately and predicts enhanced significance of this mechanism in less permeable monolayers. This study demonstrates that DCS transiently alters the transport function of the BBB suggesting a new adjunct mechanism of tDCS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.