Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29915034›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

Altering gain of the infralimbic-to-accumbens shell circuit alters economically dissociable decision-making algorithms.

Brian M Sweis, Erin B Larson, A David Redish, Mark J Thomas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Histamine HBiological psychiatry · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Brian M SweisGraduate Program in Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455.
Erin B LarsonDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455.
A David RedishDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455; redish@umn.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3644-9072
Mark J ThomasDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455.

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM008244 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI SHIMIZU, YOJI · 1988 to 2024
$13.6M
Testing hybrid theories of action-selectionR01MH112688 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI A DAVID REDISH · 2017 to 2026
$5.0M
PREDOCTORAL TRAINING OF NEUROSCIENTISTST32GM008471 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI EBNER, TIMOTHY J · 1993 to 2017
$4.9M
TEEN MOTHERS INTO ADULTHOOD AND THE NEXT GENERATIONR01DA005208 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI GILCHRIST, LEWAYNE D · 1987 to 2007
$3.9M
Relating episodic memory and episodic future thinking in hippocampusR01MH080318 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI REDISH, A DAVID · 2008 to 2020
$3.7M
Synaptic Plasticity in Animal Models of AddictionR01DA019666 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI THOMAS, MARK JOHN · 2006 to 2016
$3.0M
The covert expectation of reward during deliberationR01DA030672 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI REDISH, A DAVID · 2012 to 2016
$1.8M
Probing Neural Circuit Plasticity in Addiction RelapseK02DA035459 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI THOMAS, MARK JOHN · 2013 to 2017
$511k
Optogenetic modulation of decision-making circuitry in mouse models of addictionF30DA043326 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI SWEIS, BRIAN MUSA · 2017 to 2020
$139k
NIDA NIH HHS F30 DA043326NIDA NIH HHS K02 DA035459NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA005208NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA019666NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA030672NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008244NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008471NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH080318NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH112688
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nucleus accumbens shell (NAcSh) is involved in reward valuation. Excitatory projections from infralimbic cortex (IL) to NAcSh undergo synaptic remodeling in rodent models of addiction and enable the extinction of disadvantageous behaviors. However, how the strength of synaptic transmission of the IL-NAcSh circuit affects decision-making information processing and reward valuation remains unknown, particularly because these processes can conflict within a given trial and particularly given recent data suggesting that decisions arise from separable information-processing algorithms. The approach of many neuromodulation studies is to disrupt information flow during on-going behaviors; however, this limits the interpretation of endogenous encoding of computational processes. Furthermore, many studies are limited by the use of simple behavioral tests of value which are unable to dissociate neurally distinct decision-making algorithms. We optogenetically altered the strength of synaptic transmission between glutamatergic IL-NAcSh projections in mice trained on a neuroeconomic task capable of separating multiple valuation processes. We found that induction of long-term depression in these synapses produced lasting changes in foraging processes without disrupting deliberative processes. Mice displayed inflated reevaluations to stay when deciding whether to abandon continued reward-seeking investments but displayed no changes during initial commitment decisions. We also developed an ensemble-level measure of circuit-specific plasticity that revealed individual differences in foraging valuation tendencies. Our results demonstrate that alterations in projection-specific synaptic strength between the IL and the NAcSh are capable of augmenting self-control economic valuations within a particular decision-making modality and suggest that the valuation mechanisms for these multiple decision-making modalities arise from different circuits.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsDecision MakingLimbic SystemMaleMiceNucleus AccumbensSynapsesSynaptic Transmissiondecision-makingmiceneuroeconomicsoptogeneticsplasticity

Identifiers

PMID29915034
PMCPMC6142249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.