Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29915007›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2018

Olfactory language and abstraction across cultures.

Asifa Majid, Niclas Burenhult, Marcus Stensmyr, Josje de Valk, Bill S Hansson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Olfactory abstraction: a communicative and metacognitive account.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. What we talk about when we talk about colors.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  15. Olfactory Language: Context Is Everything.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Varieties of abstract concepts: development, use and representation in the brain.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Asifa MajidCentre for Language Studies, Radboud University, 6525 HT Nijmegen, The Netherlands asifa.majid@let.ru.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-0132-216X
Niclas BurenhultLanguage and Cognition Department, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, 6500 AH Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Marcus StensmyrDepartment of Biology, Lund University, 22362 Lund, Sweden.
Josje de ValkCentre for Language Studies, Radboud University, 6525 HT Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Bill S HanssonDepartment of Evolutionary Neuroethology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, 07745 Jena, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Olfaction presents a particularly interesting arena to explore abstraction in language. Like other abstract domains, such as time, odours can be difficult to conceptualize. An odour cannot be seen or held, it can be difficult to locate in space, and for most people odours are difficult to verbalize. On the other hand, odours give rise to primary sensory experiences. Every time we inhale we are using olfaction to make sense of our environment. We present new experimental data from 30 Jahai hunter-gatherers from the Malay Peninsula and 30 matched Dutch participants from the Netherlands in an odour naming experiment. Participants smelled monomolecular odorants and named odours while reaction times, odour descriptors and facial expressions were measured. We show that while Dutch speakers relied on concrete descriptors, i.e. they referred to odour sources (e.g.

Indexed as

Concept FormationLanguageOdorantsAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMalaysiaMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsSmellVocabularyYoung AdultabstractcultureDutchJahailanguageolfaction

Identifiers

PMID29915007
PMCPMC6015838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.