Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29915005›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2018

Language is more abstract than you think, or, why aren't languages more iconic?

Gary Lupyan, Bodo Winter

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Large Language Models as Distributional Baselines for Language Tasks.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Sorries seem to have the harder words.British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953) · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Sounds of the future and past.British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953) · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Concepts, abstractness and inner speech.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  20. Rethinking the role of language in embodied cognition.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gary LupyanDepartment of Psychology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA lupyan@wisc.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-8441-7433
Bodo WinterDepartment of English Language and Applied Linguistics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How abstract is language? We show that abstractness pervades every corner of language, going far beyond the usual examples of

Indexed as

ComprehensionConcept FormationLanguageHumansLearningabstractionconceptsiconicityword meanings

Identifiers

PMID29915005
PMCPMC6015821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.