Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29914910›Full record

ArticleCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne2018

Ecological association between operative vaginal delivery and obstetric and birth trauma.

Giulia M Muraca, Sarka Lisonkova, Amanda Skoll, Rollin Brant, Geoffrey W Cundiff, Yasser Sabr, K S Joseph

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Maternal morbidity following a trial of labor after cesarean birth: A scoping review of operative vaginal birth compared with cesarean birth in the second stage of labor.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Severe birth injuries in neonates and associated risk factors for injury in mothers with different types of diabetes in Finland.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The authors respond to "Routine use of episiotomy with forceps should not be encouraged".CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Episiotomy use among vaginal deliveries and the association with anal sphincter injury: a population-based retrospective cohort study.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2019
    Article
  20. Taking a stand for operative vaginal delivery.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Giulia M MuracaSchool of Population and Public Health (Muraca, Lisonkova, Joseph); Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (Muraca, Lisonkova, Skoll, Cundiff, Sabr, Joseph), University of British Columbia; BC Children's and Women's Hospital and Health Centre (Muraca, Lisonkova, Skoll, Brant, Cundiff, Joseph); Department of Statistics (Brant), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (Sabr), King Saud University, King Khalid University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia gmuraca@bcchr.ca.
Sarka LisonkovaSchool of Population and Public Health (Muraca, Lisonkova, Joseph); Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (Muraca, Lisonkova, Skoll, Cundiff, Sabr, Joseph), University of British Columbia; BC Children's and Women's Hospital and Health Centre (Muraca, Lisonkova, Skoll, Brant, Cundiff, Joseph); Department of Statistics (Brant), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (Sabr), King Saud University, King Khalid University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Amanda SkollSchool of Population and Public Health (Muraca, Lisonkova, Joseph); Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (Muraca, Lisonkova, Skoll, Cundiff, Sabr, Joseph), University of British Columbia; BC Children's and Women's Hospital and Health Centre (Muraca, Lisonkova, Skoll, Brant, Cundiff, Joseph); Department of Statistics (Brant), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (Sabr), King Saud University, King Khalid University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Rollin BrantSchool of Population and Public Health (Muraca, Lisonkova, Joseph); Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (Muraca, Lisonkova, Skoll, Cundiff, Sabr, Joseph), University of British Columbia; BC Children's and Women's Hospital and Health Centre (Muraca, Lisonkova, Skoll, Brant, Cundiff, Joseph); Department of Statistics (Brant), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (Sabr), King Saud University, King Khalid University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Geoffrey W CundiffSchool of Population and Public Health (Muraca, Lisonkova, Joseph); Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (Muraca, Lisonkova, Skoll, Cundiff, Sabr, Joseph), University of British Columbia; BC Children's and Women's Hospital and Health Centre (Muraca, Lisonkova, Skoll, Brant, Cundiff, Joseph); Department of Statistics (Brant), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (Sabr), King Saud University, King Khalid University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Yasser SabrSchool of Population and Public Health (Muraca, Lisonkova, Joseph); Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (Muraca, Lisonkova, Skoll, Cundiff, Sabr, Joseph), University of British Columbia; BC Children's and Women's Hospital and Health Centre (Muraca, Lisonkova, Skoll, Brant, Cundiff, Joseph); Department of Statistics (Brant), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (Sabr), King Saud University, King Khalid University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
K S JosephSchool of Population and Public Health (Muraca, Lisonkova, Joseph); Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (Muraca, Lisonkova, Skoll, Cundiff, Sabr, Joseph), University of British Columbia; BC Children's and Women's Hospital and Health Centre (Muraca, Lisonkova, Skoll, Brant, Cundiff, Joseph); Department of Statistics (Brant), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (Sabr), King Saud University, King Khalid University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncreased use of operative vaginal delivery (use of forceps, vacuum or other device) has been recommended to address high rates of cesarean delivery. We sought to determine the association between rates of operative vaginal delivery and obstetric trauma and severe birth trauma.

methodsWe carried out an ecological analysis of term, singleton deliveries in 4 Canadian provinces (2004-2014) using data from the Canadian Institute for Health Information. The primary exposure was mode of delivery. The primary outcomes were obstetric trauma and severe birth trauma.

resultsData on 1 938 913 deliveries were analyzed. The rate of obstetric trauma was 7.2% in nulliparous women, and 2.2% and 2.7% among parous women without and with a previous cesarean delivery, respectively, and rates of severe birth trauma were 2.1, 1.7 and 0.7 per 1000, respectively. Each 1% absolute increase in rates of operative vaginal delivery was associated with a higher frequency of obstetric trauma among nulliparous women (adjusted rate ratio [ARR] 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-1.06), parous women without a previous cesarean delivery (ARR 1.10, 95% CI 1.08-1.13) and parous women with a previous cesarean delivery (ARR 1.11, 95% CI 1.07-1.16). Operative vaginal delivery was associated with more frequent severe birth trauma, but only in nulliparous women (ARR 1.05, 95% CI 1.03-1.07). In nulliparous women, sequential vacuum and forceps instrumentation was associated with the largest increase in obstetric trauma (ARR 1.44, 95% CI 1.35-1.55) and birth trauma (ARR 1.53, 95% CI 1.03-2.27).

interpretationIncreases in population rates of operative vaginal delivery are associated with higher population rates of obstetric trauma, and in nulliparous women with severe birth trauma.

Indexed as

AdultBirth InjuriesCanadaCesarean SectionDelivery, ObstetricEpisiotomyExtraction, ObstetricalFemaleHealth Care SurveysHumansInfant, NewbornLacerationsObstetric Labor ComplicationsPerineumPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID29914910
PMCPMC6008188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.