SynthesisThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2018
Delivery and impact of the NHS Health Check in the first 8 years: a systematic review.
Synthesis in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Influences on NHS Health Check behaviours: a systematic review.BMC public health · 2020Pooled it
- Evaluating the effectiveness of the NHS Health Check programme in South England: a quasi-randomised controlled trial.BMJ open · 2019Trial
- Gendered Patterns of Engagement With NHS Health Checks in a Super-Diverse City: Community Perspectives and Implications for Equity.Public health challenges · 2026Article
- Economic Evaluation of NHS England's Type 2 Diabetes Path to Remission Pilot Scheme: Evidence From Real-World Data and Patient Simulation Modelling.PharmacoEconomics - open · 2026Article
- Trends and inequalities in statin use for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease between 2009 and 2021 in England: a series of cross-sectional and cohort studies.BMJ public health · 2026Article
- Association Between Use of a Primary Care Health Check-Up Tool and the Early Detection of Chronic Diseases: A Non-Randomised Comparative Study from the POZ PLUS Pilot Programme in Poland.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- The effectiveness of interventions used to improve general health check uptake by the older adult population: a systematic review and meta-analysis.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Article
- Patterns of referrals to regional clinical genetics services for women potentially at above-population level risk of breast cancer.BJC reports · 2024Article
- Re-thinking the role of primary care in dementia prevention.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024Article
- A community health worker led approach to cardiovascular disease prevention in the UK-SPICES-Sussex (scaling-up packages of interventions for cardiovascular disease prevention in selected sites in Europe and Sub-saharan Africa): an implementation research project.Frontiers in health services · 2024Article
- Exploring targeted preventive health check interventions - a realist synthesis.BMC public health · 2023Review
- Using Polygenic Risk Scores for Prioritizing Individuals at Greatest Need of a Cardiovascular Disease Risk Assessment.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023Article
- Observational
- Cardiovascular disease risk assessment using a deep-learning-based retinal biomarker: a comparison with existing risk scores.European heart journal. Digital health · 2023Article
- Validation of a deep-learning-based retinal biomarker (Reti-CVD) in the prediction of cardiovascular disease: data from UK Biobank.BMC medicine · 2023Article
- The NHS Health Check programme: a survey of programme delivery in England before and after the Covid-19 pandemic response.NIHR open research · 2023Article
- Prioritising cardiovascular disease risk assessment to high risk individuals based on primary care records.PloS one · 2023Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSince 2009, all eligible persons in England have been entitled to an NHS Health Check. Uncertainty remains about who attends, and the health-related impacts.
aimTo review quantitative evidence on coverage (the proportion of eligible individuals who attend), uptake (proportion of invitees who attend), and impact of NHS Health Checks. DESIGN AND
settingA systematic review and quantitative data synthesis. Included were studies or data reporting coverage or uptake and studies reporting any health-related impact that used an appropriate comparison group or before- and-after study design.
methodEleven databases and additional internet sources were searched to November 2016.
resultsTwenty-six observational studies and one additional dataset were included. Since 2013, 45.6% of eligible individuals have received a health check. Coverage is higher among older people, those with a family history of coronary heart disease, those living in the most deprived areas, and some ethnic minority groups. Just under half (48.2%) of those invited have taken up the invitation. Data on uptake and impact (especially regarding health-related behaviours) are limited. Uptake is higher in older people and females, but lower in those living in the most deprived areas. Attendance is associated with small increases in disease detection, decreases in modelled cardiovascular disease risk, and increased statin and antihypertensive prescribing.
conclusionPublished attendance, uptake, and prescribing rates are all lower than originally anticipated, and data on impact are limited, with very few studies reporting the effect of attendance on health-related behaviours. High-quality studies comparing matched attendees and non-attendees and health economic analyses are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.