Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29914882›Full record

SynthesisThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2018

Delivery and impact of the NHS Health Check in the first 8 years: a systematic review.

Adam Martin, Catherine L Saunders, Emma Harte, Simon J Griffin, Calum MacLure, Jonathan Mant, Catherine Meads, Fiona M Walter, Juliet A Usher-Smith

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Re-thinking the role of primary care in dementia prevention.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Adam MartinAcademic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, and RAND Europe, Cambridge.
Catherine L SaundersPrimary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, and RAND Europe, Cambridge.
Emma HarteRAND Europe, Cambridge.
Simon J GriffinPrimary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, and Medical Research Council (MRC) Epidemiology Unit, Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
Calum MacLureRAND Europe, Cambridge.
Jonathan MantPrimary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
Catherine MeadsRAND Europe, and Faculty of Health, Social Care and Education, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge.
Fiona M WalterPrimary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
Juliet A Usher-SmithPrimary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
University of Cambridge · GBRAND Europe · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_12015/4
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSince 2009, all eligible persons in England have been entitled to an NHS Health Check. Uncertainty remains about who attends, and the health-related impacts.

aimTo review quantitative evidence on coverage (the proportion of eligible individuals who attend), uptake (proportion of invitees who attend), and impact of NHS Health Checks. DESIGN AND

settingA systematic review and quantitative data synthesis. Included were studies or data reporting coverage or uptake and studies reporting any health-related impact that used an appropriate comparison group or before- and-after study design.

methodEleven databases and additional internet sources were searched to November 2016.

resultsTwenty-six observational studies and one additional dataset were included. Since 2013, 45.6% of eligible individuals have received a health check. Coverage is higher among older people, those with a family history of coronary heart disease, those living in the most deprived areas, and some ethnic minority groups. Just under half (48.2%) of those invited have taken up the invitation. Data on uptake and impact (especially regarding health-related behaviours) are limited. Uptake is higher in older people and females, but lower in those living in the most deprived areas. Attendance is associated with small increases in disease detection, decreases in modelled cardiovascular disease risk, and increased statin and antihypertensive prescribing.

conclusionPublished attendance, uptake, and prescribing rates are all lower than originally anticipated, and data on impact are limited, with very few studies reporting the effect of attendance on health-related behaviours. High-quality studies comparing matched attendees and non-attendees and health economic analyses are required.

Indexed as

National Health ProgramsPreventive Health ServicesState MedicineCardiovascular DiseasesDelivery of Health CareDiabetes MellitusEvaluation Studies as TopicHealth PromotionHumansObservational Studies as TopicPatient Acceptance of Health CareProgram EvaluationQuality ImprovementUnited Kingdomcoveragegeneral practiceimpactNHS Health Checkprimary caresystematic reviewuptake

Identifiers

PMID29914882
PMCPMC6014431
OpenAlexW2802867643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.