Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29914566›Full record

Trial reportBMC psychology2018

A protocol for a three-arm cluster randomized controlled superiority trial investigating the effects of two pedagogical methodologies in Swedish preschool settings on language and communication, executive functions, auditive selective attention, socioemotional skills and early maths skills.

Tove Gerholm, Thomas Hörberg, Signe Tonér, Petter Kallioinen, Sofia Frankenberg, Susanne Kjällander, Anna Palmer, Hillevi Lenz Taguchi

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC psychology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tove GerholmDepartment of Linguistics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden. tove.gerholm@ling.su.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7095-0525
Thomas HörbergDepartment of Linguistics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Signe TonérDepartment of Linguistics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Petter KallioinenDepartment of Linguistics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sofia FrankenbergDepartment of Child and Youth Studies, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Susanne KjällanderDepartment of Child and Youth Studies, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Anna PalmerDepartment of Child and Youth Studies, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Hillevi Lenz TaguchiDepartment of Child and Youth Studies, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Stockholm University · SE

Funding

Vetenskapsrådet 721-2014-1786
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring the preschool years, children develop abilities and skills in areas crucial for later success in life. These abilities include language, executive functions, attention, and socioemotional skills. The pedagogical methods used in preschools hold the potential to enhance these abilities, but our knowledge of which pedagogical practices aid which abilities, and for which children, is limited. The aim of this paper is to describe an intervention study designed to evaluate and compare two pedagogical methodologies in terms of their effect on the above-mentioned skills in Swedish preschool children.

methodThe study is a randomized control trial (RCT) where two pedagogical methodologies were tested to evaluate how they enhanced children's language, executive functions and attention, socioemotional skills, and early maths skills during an intensive 6-week intervention. Eighteen preschools including 28 units and 432 children were enrolled in a municipality close to Stockholm, Sweden. The children were between 4;0 and 6;0 years old and each preschool unit was randomly assigned to either of the interventions or to the control group. Background information on all children was collected via questionnaires completed by parents and preschools. Pre- and post-intervention testing consisted of a test battery including tests on language, executive functions, selective auditive attention, socioemotional skills and early maths skills. The interventions consisted of 6 weeks of intensive practice of either a socioemotional and material learning paradigm (SEMLA), for which group-based activities and interactional structures were the main focus, or an individual, digitally implemented attention and math training paradigm, which also included a set of self-regulation practices (DIL). All preschools were evaluated with the ECERS-3. DISCUSSION: If this intervention study shows evidence of a difference between group-based learning paradigms and individual training of specific skills in terms of enhancing children's abilities in fundamental areas like language, executive functions and attention, socioemotional skills and early math, this will have big impact on the preschool agenda in the future. The potential for different pedagogical methodologies to have different impacts on children of different ages and with different backgrounds invites a wider discussion within the field of how to develop a preschool curriculum suited for all children.

Indexed as

CommunicationLanguageSocial SkillsTeachingAttentionAuditory PerceptionChildChild DevelopmentChild, PreschoolExecutive FunctionFemaleHumansMaleMathematicsSwedenCommunication skillsDigital learningEarly maths skillsExecutive functionsGroup-based learningInterventionLanguage skillsSelective attentionSocioemotional skills

Identifiers

PMID29914566
PMCPMC6006789
OpenAlexW2808419666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.