Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29914515›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2018

Clinical trials involving positron emission tomography and prostate cancer: an analysis of the ClinicalTrials.gov database.

Nikola Cihoric, Eugenia Vlaskou Badra, Alexandros Tsikkinis, Vikas Prasad, Stephanie Kroeze, Ivan Igrutinovic, Branislav Jeremic, Marcus Beck, Sebastian Zschaeck, Peter Wust and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Healthy Tissue Uptake ofJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Nikola CihoricDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland. Nikola.cihoric@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1534-8520
Eugenia Vlaskou BadraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
Alexandros TsikkinisDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
Vikas PrasadDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Stephanie KroezeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Ivan IgrutinovicUniversity of Kragujevac Faculty of Science, Kragujevac, Serbia.
Branislav JeremicBioIRC Center for Biomedical Research, Kragujevac, Serbia.
Marcus BeckDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Sebastian ZschaeckDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Peter WustDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Pirus GhadjarDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEUniversity of Bern · CHUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CHUniversity Hospital Ulm · DEUniversity of Kragujevac · RS

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe goal of this study is to evaluate the status and future perspectives of clinical trials on positron emission tomography in prostate cancer for diagnostic or therapeutic as well as for surveillance purposes.

methodsThe www.ClinicalTrials.gov database was searched on the 20th of January 2017 for all trials containing terms describing "prostate cancer" (prostate, prostatic, malignant, malignancy, cancer, tumor) and "positron emission tomography". In total 167 trials were identified. Trials that included diseases other than PCa were excluded (n = 27; 16%). Furthermore, we excluded trials (n = 4, 2%) withdrawn prior to first patient enrollment. The remaining trials (n = 137, 82%) were selected for further manual classification analysis.

resultsOne hundred thirty-seven trials were detected and analyzed. Majority of trials were in "active" recruitment status (n = 46, 34%) followed by trials that had been "completed" - (n = 34, 25%) and trials with "closed recruitment but active follow-up" (n = 23, 17%). Phase 1 and 2 comprised 46% of the complete trial portfolio. Locally confined disease was of major interest (n = 46, 34%), followed by metastatic disease - not otherwise specified (n = 43, 13%). Evaluation of PET was the primary goal of the trial in 114 (83%) cases. Most of the trials evaluated only one agent (n = 122, 89%). Choline and PSMA represented two major groups (total 50%) and they were equally distributed across trial portfolio with 25% (n = 34) each. PSMA trials showed the highest average annual growth rate of 56%. The trials were conducted in 17 countries.

conclusionThe scientific community is showing a strong and ever-growing interest in the field and we expect that in the coming years, more phase III trials will be initiated ultimately delivering the required Level 1 evidence.

Indexed as

CholineClinical Trials as TopicDatabases, FactualHumansMalePositron-Emission TomographyProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsCholineProstate-Specific AntigenCancer of prostateCancer of the prostateNeoplasms, prostateNeoplasms, prostaticPetPositron emissionPositron emission tomographyProstate cancerProstate neoplasmsProstatic cancer

Identifiers

PMID29914515
PMCPMC6006688
OpenAlexW2808483305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.