Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29914505›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2018

Effects of a powered ankle-foot orthosis on perturbed standing balance.

Amber R Emmens, Edwin H F van Asseldonk, Herman van der Kooij

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Ankle Exoskeletons May Hinder Standing Balance in Simple Models of Older and Younger Adults.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Assisting walking balance using a bio-inspired exoskeleton controller.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Introduction to a Twin Dual-Axis Robotic Platform for Studies of Lower Limb Biomechanics.IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amber R EmmensDepartment of Biomechanical Engineering, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, Enschede, 7522, NB, the Netherlands. a.r.emmens@utwente.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-5520-9643
Edwin H F van AsseldonkDepartment of Biomechanical Engineering, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, Enschede, 7522, NB, the Netherlands.
Herman van der KooijDepartment of Biomechanical Engineering, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, Enschede, 7522, NB, the Netherlands.
University of Twente · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLower extremity exoskeletons are mainly used to provide stepping support, while balancing is left to the user. Designing balance controllers is one of the biggest challenges in the development of exoskeletons. The goal of this study was to design and evaluate a balance controller for a powered ankle-foot orthosis and assess its effect on the standing balance of healthy subjects.

methodsWe designed and implemented a balance controller based on the subject's body sway. This controller was compared to a simple virtual-ankle stiffness and a zero impedance controller. Ten healthy subjects wearing a powered ankle-foot orthosis had to maintain standing balance without stepping while receiving anteroposterior pushes. Center of mass kinematics, ankle torques and muscle activity of the lower legs were analyzed to assess the balance performance of the user and exoskeleton.

resultsThe different controllers did not significantly affect the center of mass responses. However, the body sway based controller resulted in a decrease of 29% in the biological ankle torque compared to the zero impedance controller and a decrease of 32% compared to the virtual-ankle stiffness. Furthermore, the soleus muscle activity of the left and right leg decreased on average with 8%, while the tibialis anterior muscle activity increased with 47% compared to zero impedance.

conclusionThe body sway based controller generated human-like torque profiles, whereas the virtual-ankle stiffness did not. As a result, the powered ankle-foot orthosis with the body sway based controller was effective in assisting the healthy subjects in maintaining balance, although the improvements were not seen in the body sway response, but in the subjects' decreased biological ankle torques to counteract the perturbations. This decrease was a combined effect of decreased soleus muscle activity and increased tibialis anterior muscle activity.

Indexed as

Exoskeleton DeviceFoot OrthosesAdultAnkleAnkle JointBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleFootHumansMalePostural BalanceAnkle-foot orthosisBalance controlExoskeletonStanding balance

Identifiers

PMID29914505
PMCPMC6006747
OpenAlexW2808873682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.