Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29914503›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2018

Towards the measurement of food literacy with respect to healthy eating: the development and validation of the self perceived food literacy scale among an adult sample in the Netherlands.

Maartje P Poelman, S Coosje Dijkstra, Hanne Sponselee, Carlijn B M Kamphuis, Marieke C E Battjes-Fries, Marleen Gillebaart, Jacob C Seidell

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 84 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05595551 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Supporting Healthy and Sustainable Family Meals Among Parents With Lower Socioeconomic Status: Process and Effect Evaluation of the Project "Aan Tafel in 1,2,3 Euro"

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity GhentRan2022 to 2023Enrolled272ConditionsConsumer Behavior, Food SelectionArmsThe intervention "Aan Tafel in 1, 2, 3 euro"
NCT06258733 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Food Literacy Intervention for Arab and Jewish Women in the Jerusalem Region - is a "Train the Trainer" Approach Feasible and Effective?

TypeinterventionalSponsorHadassah Medical OrganizationRan2025 to 2027Enrolled480ConditionsLifestyle Risk Reduction, Health Behavior, Food HabitsArmsLay-led FL workshops, Expert-led workshops
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maartje P PoelmanDepartment of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, Princetonlaan 8a, 3584 CB, Utrecht, The Netherlands. m.p.poelman@uu.nl.
S Coosje DijkstraAmsterdam Public Health research institute, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences, VU-University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Hanne SponseleeDepartment of Social Health and Organizational Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Carlijn B M KamphuisDepartment of Interdisciplinary Sciences, Utrecht University, PO Box 80140, 3508 TC, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Marieke C E Battjes-FriesDepartment of Health and Nutrition, Louis Bolk Institute, Kosterijland 3-5, 3981 AJ, Bunnik, The Netherlands.
Marleen GillebaartDepartment of Social Health and Organizational Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jacob C SeidellAmsterdam Public Health research institute, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences, VU-University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 451-16-029
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFood literacy refers to the capability to make healthy food choices in different contexts, settings and situations. The aim of this study is to develop and validate the self-perceived food literacy (SPFL) scale, to assess individuals' level of food literacy, including a knowledge, skills and behavior to plan, manage, select, prepare and eat food healthfully.

methodsAn initial set of 50 items for the SPFL scale were generated based on expert insights and literature. A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among a sample of Dutch adults (n = 755) in order to determine convergent, divergent and criterion validation against psychosocial variables that were expected to correlate with food literacy (self-control, impulsiveness) and against the expected outcome of high food literacy, namely healthy food consumption. Principal Component Analyses (PCA), Pearson correlation tests and linear regression analyses were conducted. The capacity to distinguish of the SPFL scale was determined by comparing SPFL scores of the general population with that of a sample of dieticians (n = 207).

resultsThe participants in the general sample had an average age of 44.8 (SD:16.1), the majority were women (90.7%), they had a healthy weight (61.4%) and were highly educated (59.1%). Of the initial 50 items, 29 items remained after PCA and reflected eight domains of food literacy. SPFL was positively correlated with self-control (r = 0.51, p = <.001) and negatively with impulsiveness (r = - 0.31, p = <.01). Participants with higher levels of food literacy reported a significantly higher frequency of fruit consumption (≥5 times/week), vegetable consumption (≥5times/week) and fish consumption (≥1times/week) and consumed larger portions of fruit (≥2pieces/day) and vegetables ≥200 g/day) in comparison with participants who had lower levels of food literacy. Dieticians had slightly higher scores on SPFL than general adults (B = 0.08, SE = 0.03, t = 2.83, 95%-CI = 0.03 to 0.14).

conclusionsThe 29 item SPFL scale is a validated, expert-based and theory-driven tool for measuring self-perceived food literacy with respect to healthy eating among adults. Higher levels of food literacy were associated with more self-control, less impulsiveness and healthier food consumption. Additional research is needed to validate the SPFL scale in different populations (different age groups, socioeconomic groups, male populations) and in different contexts.

Indexed as

Diet, HealthyFood PreferencesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth LiteracySelf ConceptAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansImpulsive BehaviorMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsSelf-ControlSelf EfficacyEating behaviorFood consumptionFood literacyHealthImpulsivenessQuestionnaireSelf-control

Identifiers

PMID29914503
PMCPMC6006995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.